Skip to content

· Private foundation

Scott and Jessica McClintock Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$392k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$53k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

95% of Scott and Jessica McClintock Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 19 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Scott and Jessica McClintock Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 19 organizations, $392k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’19
13
’20
15
’21
17
’22
20
’23
19
’24
19
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Animals$1.3MEnvironment$1.2MScience & Tech$23kMembership Benefit$2k
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $305k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$13,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC$53,400
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$39,000
ECO ERA$38,200
AKASHINGA INC$36,600
NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC$30,000
OCEANA INC$24,000
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC$24,000
THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE$24,000
NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC$24,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$18,000
OCEANSWIDE INC$13,000
TROUT UNLIMITED INC$12,000
TROUT UNLIMITED INC$12,000
OCEANSWIDE INC$10,000
AMERICAN WILD HORSE FOUNDATION$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $8.3M → 7%AKASHINGA INC: $37k → 22%ECO ERA: $38k → 8%NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC: $39k → 11%SHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $72k → 14%AKASHINGA INC: $49k → 8%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $60k → 14%INTERNATIONAL ANTI-POACHING FOUNDATION INC: $42k → 7%PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $24k → 19%NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $33k → 12%INTERNATIONAL ANTI-POACHING FOUNDATION INC: $32k → 22%NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC: $37k → 11%SHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $91k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $65k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $56k → 14%TROUT UNLIMITED INC: $23k → 7%PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $24k → 19%NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $30k → 12%NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC: $34k → 11%SHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $28k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $60k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $55k → 14%NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC: $29k → 11%SHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $26k → 14%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $42k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $49k → 14%NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC: $27k → 11%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $39k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $34k → 14%NATIONAL MARINE MAMMAL FOUNDATION INC: $24k → 11%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $36k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $29k → 14%SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $68k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $30k → 14%THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $24k → 14%SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $53k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25k → 14%SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $45k → 17%SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $40k → 17%SHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $80k → 14%SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $32k → 17%OCEANA INC: $36k → 14%OCEANA INC: $36k → 14%OCEANA INC: $32k → 14%OCEANA INC: $27k → 14%OCEANA INC: $24k → 14%OCEANA INC: $24k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
NV
PA
CA
WV
VA
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 21 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
4

Total granted

$3.0M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+49%

Still filing today

90%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $502k · revenue +47%
  • TE
    THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $307k · revenue +59%
  • NM
    National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $232k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $34k · revenue +49%
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED INC
    one grant, 2021 · $19k
  • ST
    SAVE THE CHIMPS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Panthera Corporation

Panthera's mission is the conservation of the world's 40 wild cat species, many of which are endangered or threatened. panthera develops, implements and oversees wild cat conservation strategies on a global scale.

Animals
2
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
3
International Snow Leopard Trust

The international snow leopard trust aims to ethically conserve snow leopards and their high mountain ecosystems through partnerships with indigenous peoples and local communities, and through research to improve the understanding of snow…

Animals
4
Wildlife Alliance Inc

Wildlife alliance is the leader in direct protection of forests and wildlife in tropical asia. our mission is to combat deforestation, biodiversity loss, climate change, and poverty by partnering with local communities and governments.…

Animals
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
7
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
8
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
9
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
10
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
11
The Nature Conservancy

The mission of the nature conservancy is to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends.

—
12
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee; the most unlike its peers is Trout Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $8,312,619 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUSTSHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $462,500 · AnimalsSHANNON ELIZABETH…SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $371,400 · AnimalsSAVE THE RHINO IN…THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $307,200 · AnimalsTHE ELEPHANT SANC…National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc: $231,900 · AnimalsNational Marine M…AKASHINGA INC: $226,300 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INCPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $84,500 · Animals+8 more: $112,800 · Animals+8 moreWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $502,400 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDL…OCEANA INC: $186,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $184,972 · EnvironmentNatural Res…ECO ERA: $121,100 · EnvironmentECO ERANATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,200 · EnvironmentOCEANSWIDE INC: $40,200 · Environment+2 more: $39,900 · EnvironmentTROUT UNLIMITED: $70,000 · OtherCIRCLE OF SACRED NATURE: $24,800 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $18,600 · OtherAMERICAN WILD HORSE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $20,050 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$8,312,619Animals$1,796,600Environment$1,119,772Other$120,400Arts & Culture$20,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $8,312,619 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $502,400 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION: $462,500 over 5y, 61% of budgetSAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC: $371,400 over 7y, 8.6% of budgetTHE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE: $307,200 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNational Marine Mammal Foundation Inc: $231,900 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $226,300 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetOCEANA INC: $186,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Resources Council of Maine Inc: $184,972 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetECO ERA: $121,100 over 5y, 81% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $84,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMountain Lion Foundation: $53,800 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $45,200 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANSWIDE INC: $40,200 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $37,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC: $34,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Katahdin Woods & Waters: $20,050 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS: $12,800 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $7,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA WATCH: $2,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDedication and Everlasting Love to Animals: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHANNON ELIZABETH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE RHINO INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELEPHANT SANCTUARY IN TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds National Marine Mammal Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AKASHINGA INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds Natural Resources Council of Maine Inc ↗
  • Who funds ECO ERA ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Mountain Lion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEANSWIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TROUT UNLIMITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Katahdin Woods & Waters ↗
  • Who funds PAWSITIVE BEGINNINGS ↗
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA WATCH ↗
  • Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
  • Who funds Dedication and Everlasting Love to Animals ↗
  • Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAVEN CAN WAIT ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Scott and Jessica McClintock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Scott and Jessica McClintock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scott and Jessica McClintock’s filings →

More from the funding graph