Skip to content
Schostak Family Support Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Schostak Family Support Foundation

To support the jewish community and the community as a whole.

$359k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$792kPhilanthropy$691kInternational$556kReligion$526kHealth$340kScience & Tech$40kArts & Culture$33kEnvironment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 9 grants below total $295,650, the rows itemized in this filing. The $358,850 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $63,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $168k
$18,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$-1523
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$118,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$40,000
ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE$25,650
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES$18,000
LAWFARE PROJECT INC$18,000
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE$10,000
NF FORWARD$10,000
HILLEL DAY SCHOOL$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER PILLAR: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER PILLAR: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER PILLAR: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$2.0M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    6× · 2017–2025 · $591k
  • AS
    ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $431k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • JS
    JEWISH SENIOR LIFE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +22%
  • DETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
10
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
11
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
12
University of Judaism Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit; the most unlike its peers is Tsfr Care Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
24/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $591,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE: $430,735 · OtherADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUEOAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $200,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITY+10 more: $151,667 · Other+10 moreUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $432,831 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $200,250 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETR…JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $43,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…+1 more: $15,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCAT…Central Fund of Israel: $118,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of IsraelTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC: $43,000 · InternationalTHE LAWFARE PROJECT IN…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $40,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR T…+4 more: $60,000 · International+4 moreBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · HealthBEAUMONT H…WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $100,000 · HealthWILLIAM BE…NFX: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $11,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $10,000 · EducationJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $5,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $20,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $18,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,373,402Philanthropy$691,081International$611,000Health$270,000Education$46,000Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION: $432,831 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $350,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $200,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $118,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC: $43,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT: $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL STARS BASEBALL: $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Eugene Applebaum …William Davidson Foun…Community Foundation …Hermelin Family Suppo…The Irving and Ethel …Edward C and Linda Dr…DTE Energy FoundationThe Kresge FoundationGrosfeld FoundationHarold and Penny B Bl…Karp Family FoundationThe Samuel and Jean F…
The Eugene Applebaum Family FoundationMI28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · William Davidson Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Hermelin Family Support Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Karp Family Foundation · The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schostak Family Support Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schostak Family Support Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schostak Family Support Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schostak Family Support Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schostak Family Support’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home