Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Karp Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$877k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$630k
Largest
01What you fund
0194% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$2.5MArts & Culture$1.7MReligion$1.3MPhilanthropy$349kEducation$245kInternational$182kFood & Nutrition$111kHuman Services$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $72k
  • $250k+1 grant · $630k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Holocaust Memorial Center$630,000
Jewish Hospice & Chaplaincy Network$72,000
Jewish Federation of Metro Detroit$40,000
FIDF$38,833
Insight Through Education$20,000
American Friends of Magen David Adom$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Friendship Circle$7,200
JARC$5,000
Child Safe Michigan$5,000
Detroit Symphony Orchestra$5,000
Jewish Community Center$5,000
Jewish Senior Life - PHSF$5,000
Adat Shalom Synagogue$3,600
Congregation Shaarey Zedek$3,600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%JSL Foundation: $2k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN: $5k → 8%JARC: $5k → 8%Child Safe Michigan: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 27 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
6

Total granted

$6.0M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
0%

Still filing today

37%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEducationReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +64%
  • IT
    INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $68k · revenue +125%
  • DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $30k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -74%
  • TI
    THE INTERNATIONAL RAOUL WALLENBERG FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
3
University of Judaism Foundation
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

5
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
6
Jewish Home and Aging Services

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

7
Jewish Federation of Greater Ann Arbor

The federation provides and inspires philanthropic leadership and community-building to nurture a strong, engaged, connected, vibrant, and enduring jewish community locally, in israel, and around the world.

Philanthropy
8
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
9
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
10
Jewish Home Services Inc

Jewish senior life of metropolitan detroit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for older adults of the metropolitan detroit jewish community through the provision of personalized high quality programs and services that support…

Human Services
11
Flint Jewish Federation

To further the welfare of the jewish community

Philanthropy
12
Jewish Federation of Madison Inc

To inspire, build, and sustain vibrant jewish life by fostering diverse opportunities to connect at every age and mobilizing our community in common purpose, in madison, israel, and around the world.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is The International Raoul Wallenberg Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%9%5–10yr21%22%10–20yr20%17%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr12%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr20%8%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr12%54%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
12%
3,222/27,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $2,003,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUSC SHOAH FOUNDATION — $774,760 · OtherUSC SHOAH FOUNDATIONSHOAH FOUNDATION — $431,712 · OtherSHOAH FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $289,167 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES+24 more — $523,000 · Other+24 moreHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $1,420,734 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER I…INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC — $67,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $66,400 · Arts & CultureJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $307,400 · ReligionJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $208,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $90,000 · PhilanthropyBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $105,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $38,833 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $15,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC — $10,000 · InternationalJARC — $40,000 · Human ServicesCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $15,000 · Human Services+1 more — $1,800 · Human Services
Other$4,021,639Arts & Culture$1,554,634Religion$307,400Philanthropy$298,500Health$105,000International$63,833Human Services$56,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC — $1,420,734 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetJEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK — $307,400 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $208,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $105,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC — $67,500 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetJARC — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC — $22,400 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHILD SAFE MICHIGAN — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCABARET 313 INC — $14,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL RAOUL WALLENBERG FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $5,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJSL FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPICE & CHAPLAINCY NETWORK
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INSIGHT THROUGH EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds JARC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
  • Who funds DETROIT SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
  • Who funds CHILD SAFE MICHIGAN
  • Who funds CABARET 313 INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAHAD - IN UNUM INC
  • Who funds THE INTERNATIONAL RAOUL WALLENBERG FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds JEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family FoundationMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Grosfeld Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · The Gregg and Harriet Orley Family Foundation · Hermelin Family Support Foundation · Shari & Alon Friendship Foundation Inc · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation · The Bruce H and Rosalie N Rosen Family Foundation · Mickey Shapiro Charitable Trust · Pappas Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Karp Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph