Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Schostak Family Support Foundation

To support the jewish community and the community as a whole.

$359k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$792kPhilanthropy$691kInternational$556kReligion$526kHealth$340kScience & Tech$40kArts & Culture$33kEnvironment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 9 grants below total $295,650 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $358,850 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $63,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $168k
$18,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$-1523
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$118,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$40,000
ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE$25,650
LAWFARE PROJECT INC$18,000
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES$18,000
NF FORWARD$10,000
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE$10,000
HILLEL DAY SCHOOL$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER PILLAR: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER PILLAR: $5k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER PILLAR: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 14 repeat orgs$322k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
17

Total granted

$2.0M
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+14%

Still filing today

50%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
    6× · 2017–2025 · $591k
  • AS
    ADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $431k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $350k · revenue -33%

Funded once

  • JS
    JEWISH SENIOR LIFE OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $18k · revenue +22%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

10
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
11
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
12
University of Judaism Foundation

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Detroit and the most unlike its peers is Tsfr Care Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Recreation & Sports P…Arts Organizations and Muse…Family Philanthropic Founda…Advocacy and Education Orga…Supportive Housing & Recove…Christian Churches and Mini…Charter Schools and Youth E…University Support Organiza…Hospital Foundations and Me…Supportive Housing & Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%2%<5yr13%14%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr15%22%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr18%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%23%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr15%4%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr18%45%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,804

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/43
Grantees still filing
24/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $591,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUE — $430,735 · OtherADAT SHALOM SYNAGOGUEOAKLAND UNIVERSITY — $200,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITY+10 more — $151,667 · Other+10 moreUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $432,831 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATIONJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $200,250 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETR…JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $43,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…+1 more — $15,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCAT…Central Fund of Israel — $118,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of IsraelTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $43,000 · InternationalTHE LAWFARE PROJECT IN…AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $40,000 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR T…+4 more — $60,000 · International+4 moreBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthBEAUMONT H…WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL — $100,000 · HealthWILLIAM BE…NFX — $10,000 · Health+2 more — $10,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $11,000 · EducationCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $10,000 · EducationJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $5,000 · EducationJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $20,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $18,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,373,402Philanthropy$691,081International$611,000Health$270,000Education$46,000Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$23,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH FOUNDATION — $432,831 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $350,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT — $200,250 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel — $118,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES — $43,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAWFARE PROJECT INC — $43,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM — $18,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LATET HUMANITARIAN AID INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZAKA NORTH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NISHMAT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE KOBY MANDELL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDETROIT RIVERFRONT CONSERVANCY INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL DAY SCHOOL OF METRO DETROIT — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetB'NAI B'RITH YOUTH ORGANIZATION — $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN LAND INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE FOR CREATIVE STUDIES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEAN AND SAMUEL FRANKEL JEWISH ACADEMY OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL STARS BASEBALL — $5,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY OF HOPE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Eugene Applebaum Family FoundationMI28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · William Davidson Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Hermelin Family Support Foundation · The Irving and Ethel Palman Foundation · Edward C and Linda Dresner Levy Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · Grosfeld Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · Karp Family Foundation · The Samuel and Jean Frankel Jewish Heritage Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schostak Family Support Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schostak Family Support Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schostak Family Support Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph