Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schoenith Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$138kHealth$61kArts & Culture$55kYouth Development$52kAnimals$48kHousing & Shelter$30kScience & Tech$25kRecreation & Sports$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTHS$10,000
FRAXA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$7,500
CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY$5,000
ART OF ELAN$5,000
WORDS ALIVE$4,000
YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES$4,000
HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES$3,000
E2D INC$3,000
FRAGILE X SOCIETY ASSN OF SOUTHERN CA$2,500
SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY$1,500
SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY$1,000
LIVES IN THE BALANCE INC$1,000
MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRAXA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%ART PRODUCE: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $5k → 12%NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $12k → 6%FRAXA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%ART OF ELAN: $6k → 11%CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $4k → 12%MOORESVILLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $4k → 9%FRAXA RESEARCH FDN: $5k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $9k → 11%CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY: $4k → 12%FRAXA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%ART OF ELAN: $6k → 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $6k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $8k → 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $5k → 10%ART OF ELAN: $5k → 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $4k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $7k → 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $4k → 10%ART PRODUCE: $4k → 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $4k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $7k → 11%YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $4k → 10%ART OF ELAN: $4k → 11%HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $6k → 11%ART OF ELAN: $4k → 11%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $4k → 11%ART OF ELAN: $4k → 11%E2D INC: $7k → 10%SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY: $4k → 11%E2D INC: $6k → 10%ART OF ELAN: $4k → 11%SDSU AZTEC CLUB: $8k → 11%AZTEC CLUB: $8k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $12k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $12k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $12k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $11k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $9k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $8k → 11%WORDS ALIVE: $7k → 11%SAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FDN: $5k → 11%SAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FDN: $5k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $10k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $8k → 11%MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MA
IA
CA
VA
NC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$428k · 22 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
20

Total granted

$428k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+44%

Still filing today

77%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    Words Alive
    9× · 2017–2025 · $78k · revenue +58%
  • SD
    San Diego Bird Alliance
    9× · 2017–2025 · $48k · revenue +84%
  • AO
    ART OF ELAN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $37k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • FX
    FRAGILE X SOCIETY ASSOCIATION OF S CALI
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • SA
    SDSU AZTEC CLUB
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • MC
    MOORESVILLE CHILDREN'S THEATRE
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

—
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
San Diego Habitat Conservancy

Acquire, manage and protect land in perpetuity that supports sensitive habitats and species, and to educate and inspire people and communities as stewards and advocates of their natural environment.

Arts & Culture
4
Dreams for Change Inc

Dreams for Change's mission is to respond to the needs of San Diegans by creating innovative and cost-effective programs to empower and stabilize the lives of under-served families and individuals.

Human Services
5
The New Childrens Museum

The New Childrens Museum (the Museum) in San Diego is an arts-based childrens museum whose mission is to stimulate imagination, creativity, and critical thinking in children and families through inventive, engaging experiences with…

Arts & Culture
6
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
7
Institute of Contemporary Art San Diego

to advance regional contemporary art and artists while fostering cultural equity through access to meaningful art experiences

Arts & Culture
8
Institute for Public Strategies

Institute of Public Strategies (IPS) is a nonprofit corporation that receives its funding from local and federal governmental agencies and private foundations, through long-term grants or contracts to provide community-level services…

Health
9
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech
10
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
11
San Diego Squared

To advance workforce and talent development within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics ("STEM") sectors by fostering excellence in education, expanding access to opportunities, and delivering transformative resources to…

Education
12
Policy & Innovation Center

The policy & innovation center's (pic) mission is to unlock the region's potential by cultivating and building partnerships. our niche is to address intractable issues that can only be solved with cross-sector, multi-jurisdictional…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding San Diego; the most unlike its peers is San Diego Breastfeeding Center Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $27,000 · OtherYOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVESE2D INC: $24,500 · OtherE2D INCArt Produce: $13,000 · OtherArt ProduceAZTEC CLUB: $11,000 · OtherAZTEC CLUBFRAGILE X SOCIETY ASSOCIATION OF S CALI: $10,000 · OtherFRAGILE X SOCIETY ASSOCIATION OF S C…FRAGILE X SOCIETY ASSN OF SOUTHERN CA: $8,000 · OtherSDSU AZTEC CLUB: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $10,000 · OtherACCESSURF HAWAII INC+17 more: $40,000 · Other+17 moreWords Alive: $77,500 · Arts & CultureWords AliveART OF ELAN: $37,000 · Arts & CultureART OF ELANROOF ABOVE INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureROOF ABOVE INC+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureSan Diego Bird Alliance: $47,500 · EnvironmentSan Diego Bird…California Native Plant Society: $15,000 · EnvironmentCalifornia Nat…+1 more: $500 · EnvironmentMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $30,500 · EducationMONARCH SCHOO…SAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FOUNDATION: $21,500 · EducationSAN DIEGO BRE…Teach for America Inc: $4,000 · EducationTeach for Ame…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthFRAXA Res…THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthTHE NATIO…JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentIncludEd: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $20,500 · Housing & Shelter
Other$156,500Arts & Culture$124,500Environment$63,000Education$60,000Health$39,000Youth Development$22,500Housing & Shelter$20,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWords Alive: $77,500 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetSan Diego Bird Alliance: $47,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetART OF ELAN: $37,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetMONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT: $30,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES: $27,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFRAXA Research Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FOUNDATION: $21,500 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetHOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC: $20,500 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetJUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH: $19,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCalifornia Native Plant Society: $15,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetArt Produce: $13,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSONNY CARTER FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIncludEd: $3,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetONE MORE WAVE SURF CORP: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLives in the Balance Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetABANDON PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC RIM CONSERVATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Words Alive ↗
  • Who funds San Diego Bird Alliance ↗
  • Who funds ART OF ELAN ↗
  • Who funds MONARCH SCHOOL PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds FRAXA Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO BREASTFEEDING CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOSKINS PARK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds JUST IN TIME FOR FOSTER YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds California Native Plant Society ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Art Produce ↗
  • Who funds ACCESSURF HAWAII INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds SONNY CARTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds IncludEd ↗
  • Who funds ONE MORE WAVE SURF CORP ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds Lives in the Balance Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABANDON PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISON UNIVERSITY PROJECT INC DBA MOUNT TAMALPAIS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA20.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Parker Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Duke Energy Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schoenith Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schoenith Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schoenith Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Schoenith Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Schoenith’s filings →

    More from the funding graph