· Private foundation
Schimmel Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $75k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEART FOR AFRICA INC | $50,000 |
| WOMEN TO THE WORLD INC | $37,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC | $10,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGR | $10,000 |
| AMIGOS FOR CHRIST | $10,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $5,000 |
| MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP | $5,000 |
| CARE USA | $5,000 |
| BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| ONE COLLECTIVE | $5,000 |
| EMMANUEL COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| JUBILEE PARTNERS INC | $5,000 |
| ATHENS TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS OF OGLETHORPE | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $135k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +77% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WTWomen to the World Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $209k · revenue +11% · 46% of their budget
- HFHEART FOR AFRICA INC7× · 2017–2025 · $203k · revenue +103%
- BMBLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +329%
Funded once
- VHVALLEY HOPE CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $100k
- COCITY OF LEXINGTONone grant, 2017 · $15k
- GCGARDEN CITY CHAPELone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…
See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.
The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).
To empower chronically hungry farm families in africa to lift themselves out of hunger and poverty. one acre fund achieves its mission by working with self-help groups in rural villages to deliberately reach the most severely…
Lebanese american university is committed to academic excellence, student-centeredness, civic engagement, the advancement of scholarship, the education of the whole person, and the formation of leaders in a diverse world.
George fox university, a christ centered community, prepares students spiritually, academically, and professionally to think with clarity, act with integrity, and serve with passion.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Eastern university is a diverse, christ-centered community preparing graduates to impact the world through faith, reason, and justice.
The foundation accepts, manages, and disburses private support to the university of memphis.
Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity in Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Women to the World Inc ↗
- Who funds HEART FOR AFRICA INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK MOUNTAIN HOME FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA FFA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ATHENS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CHRISTMAS ↗
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds U S POULTRY & EGG HAROLD E FORD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds Amigos For Christ Inc ↗
- Who funds HAITI EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ONE COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds THE NETHERLAND-AMERICA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Living Water International ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL EGG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLORY RIDGE INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTERBOX USA INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Extra Special People Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG OAK RANCH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Servant Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schimmel Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.