· Private foundation
Saw Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION | $1,974 |
| JLAD | $1,500 |
| GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| BETTER TOGETHER | $1,000 |
| WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL | $1,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE | $1,000 |
| PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION | $1,000 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $750 |
| FOR HIM TODAY INC | $750 |
| SUNLIGHT HOME | $750 |
| PKD FOUNDATION | $750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| SALEM ORCHESTRA | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOAMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +131%
- LVLUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC4× · 2020–2023 · $7k · revenue +7%
- GCGRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +119%
Funded once
- YCYAMHILL COUNTY GOSPEL RESCUE MISSIONone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -6%
- WVWILLAMETTE VITAL HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $875 · revenue -10%
- TAThe American Red Crossone grant, 2020 · $750
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pregnancy Choices is a Christian ministry caring for those touched by unplanned pregnancy by providing options and resources that promote life.
Choosing Life over Abortion
The palmetto women's center in rock hill, sc is a non-profit agency serving the greater rock hill area since 1984. pwc offers pregnancy counseling, medical services, such as ultrasound and pregnancy testing, case management options to…
It is our mission to provide women with medical care and alternatives to abortion as we proclaim the hope of the Gospel.
The organization strives to offer hope, help, and healing to women facing an unplanned pregnancy.
Empower people by listening to their needs, supporting them with options, resources and education, and connecting with individuals and families dealing with planned or unplanned pregnancies.
The Women's Life Care Center exists to promote the sanctity of human life, born and unborn, through the provision of abortion alternative services that empower mothers to choose life.
Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
The mission of options for women is to confidentially aid those facing abortion decisions in northeastern missouri and surrounding area through the complimentary clinical, material, educational, emotional, and spiritual support required to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunlight of Collier County Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Preemptive Love Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN OPINION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE FOR AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS INC ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES-USA INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION ↗
- Who funds SALEM LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PKD Foundation ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds Pregnancy Resource Center INC dba Hope Pregnancy Center ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE MID-WILLAMETTE VALLEY ↗
- Who funds SALEM ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds YAMHILL COUNTY GOSPEL RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BETTER TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds WILLAMETTE VITAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FOR HIM TODAY INC ↗
- Who funds SUNLIGHT OF COLLIER COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maps Community Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Saw Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of the Mid-Willamette Valley — 19% of income from government
- Salem Leadership Foundation — 8% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.