· Private foundation
Saul & Devorah Sherman Fund
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $54k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI | $18,129 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $18,000 |
| HOPEWELL FUND | $18,000 |
| SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $9,885 |
| MT WASHINGTON PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL | $7,255 |
| COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RTS | $5,000 |
| LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER | $5,000 |
| FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH | $2,860 |
| NOURISHING HOPE | $2,625 |
| MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $2,500 |
| MISHKAN CHICAGO | $1,258 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,125 |
| JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION | $500 |
| THE CARTER BURDEN NETWORK | $500 |
| BROADWAY CARES | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NNNEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL6× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +34%
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE6× · 2018–2024 · $70k · revenue +80%
- SPSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC6× · 2017–2024 · $30k · revenue +10%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $8k
- MAMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $7k
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -41%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
A nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to enhancing international peace and security in the 21st century, thereby retaining its focus on nuclear weapons but expanding to include other present emerging security threats.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership With Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gift of Life Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 169 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEAR NORTH MONTESSORI SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds THE POSSIBILITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds Destiny Arts Center ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds HAMPTONS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LEGAL AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
- Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC ↗
- Who funds 350ORG ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds LAWNDALE CHRISTIAN LEGAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds Center for Therapeutic Riding of the East End Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Field Foundation of Illinois · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · David B Kriser Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Riggio Foundation · Chicago Foundation for Women
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Saul & Devorah Sherman Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
- World Forestry Center — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.