Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sarma Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$319kFood & Nutrition$209kPublic Safety & Disaster$170kHealth$128kEducation$114kPhilanthropy$106kYouth Development$85kRecreation & Sports$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$85,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
VALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION$38,000
GUADALUPE REGIONAL MED FOUNDATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS$20,000
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SAN ANTONIO$15,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO$10,000
SPURS GIVE$10,000
SAN ANTONIO BOWL ASSN$7,500
ARBOR CIRCLE$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,150
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
ST MARY'S UNIVERISTY$5,000
SSFCU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$4,000
OAK HILLS FOUNDATION$2,746
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $7k → 11%OPERATION TURKEY: $384 → 10%CHILDRENS HARBOR: $1k → 13%ARBOR CIRCLE: $7k → 11%ARBOR CIRCLE: $7k → 11%CHILDRENS SHELTER: $241 → 16%BOYSVILLE: $1k → 16%SPURS GIVE: $25k → 16%SPURS GIVE: $25k → 16%SPURS GIVE: $25k → 16%SPURS GIVE: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Sarma Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 94% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 87%.

Sarma Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$913k · 14 repeat orgs$309k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
41

Total granted

$913k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+17%

Still filing today

57%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthPhilanthropyEducationHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $243k · revenue +49%
  • SG
    SPURS GIVE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $85k · revenue +401%
  • VE
    VALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF L
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • FS
    FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of San Antonio Inc

To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.

Health
3
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
4
The Good Foundation of Texas
Philanthropy
5
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
6
Greater Texas Foundation
Education
7
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
8
North Central Texas Medical Foundation
Health
9
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
10
Sa Cancer Council

The mission of the sa cancer council is to provide financial resources for patient assistance services and cancer research to support the mays cancer center, home to ut health san antonio md anderson.

—
11
Texas Bankers Foundation
Education
12
Southern Federation Foundation Inc

Provide funding for charitable, literary, cultural, and educational endeavors.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Area Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Ian S Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
18/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS: $170,100 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $158,987 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF L: $75,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS: $45,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO: $25,000 · Other+44 more: $118,203 · Other+44 moreHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $243,000 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY O…SPURS GIVE: $85,000 · Human ServicesSPURS GIV…THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $21,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARBOR…+4 more: $2,625 · Human ServicesVALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · PhilanthropyVALERO EN…SSFCU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 · PhilanthropySSFCU CHA…SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropySAN ANTON…+2 more: $4,050 · PhilanthropyGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $57,500 · HealthSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER: $25,000 · Health+3 more: $2,740 · HealthFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $25,000 · Community Improvement
Other$642,290Housing & Shelter$243,000Human Services$108,625Philanthropy$103,550Health$85,240Food & Nutrition$25,000Community Improvement$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $243,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $158,987 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPURS GIVE: $85,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetVALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $57,500 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSSFCU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $29,500 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION: $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSt Mary's University: $12,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO BOWL ASSOCIATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSan Antonio Report: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTHSIDE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDRENS HARBOR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUPPORT FOR LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLITERACY SAN ANTONIO INC DBA TXREADS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYSVILLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI GREATER SAN ANTONIO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FERRARI KID: $740 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION TURKEY DAILY: $384 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $241 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SPURS GIVE ↗
  • Who funds VALERO ENERGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE REGIONAL MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SSFCU CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ARBOR CIRCLE CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds St Mary's University ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO BOWL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Report ↗
  • Who funds THE PROSTHETIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RONALD McDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER NORTH TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSIDE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX27.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation Group Return · The Dixie Starnes Wenger Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nustar Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sarma Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sarma Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sarma Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sarma Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sarma’s filings →

More from the funding graph