Skip to content
Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San at a glance

· Public charity

Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San

Promote the welfare and working conditions of members of the teamsters local no.

$131k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Employment$71kPhilanthropy$64kPublic Benefit$40kEducation$29kAnimals$10kHousing & Shelter$10kHealth$9kMembership Benefit$6k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $51,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $130,775 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $79,775 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$12,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
All Charities Teamsters$20,000
TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO7$12,500
WORKING PARTNERSHIPS INC$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL$8,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WORKING PARTNERSHIPS INC: $10k → 11%SMCLC MEMBER TO MEMBER FUND: $6k → 7%WORKING PARTNERSHIP USA: $9k → 8%All Charities Teamsters: $20k → 10%AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL: $10k → 10%Teamsters Scholarship Fund: $10k → 14%TEAMSTERS LOCAL 769: $6k → 15%All Charities Teamsters: $16k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO FOR LONDON BREED 2018: $10k → 10%James R Hoffa Scholarship Fund: $8k → 14%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO7: $13k → 10%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $25k → 10%All Charities Teamsters: $8k → 10%All Charities Teamsters: $16k → 10%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO7: $6k → 10%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $10k → 10%Teamsters Joint Council No7: $6k → 10%TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL 7: $10k → 10%Teamsters Joint Council No7: $9k → 10%ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS: $6k → 10%San Franciscans for Fair Rates - Yes on F: $40k → 10%San Francisco Labor Council General Fund: $18k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL: $9k → 10%SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$176k · 3 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -26% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
9

Total granted

$176k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-26%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    Teamsters All Charities Fund
    7× · 2018–2025 · $100k · revenue +4%
  • TJ
    Teamsters' Joint Council No 7
    5× · 2020–2025 · $43k · revenue +45%
  • SF
    San Francisco Labor Council
    3× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • SF
    San Franciscans for Fair Rates - Yes on F
    one grant, 2022 · $40k
  • IB
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • AH
    AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Brotherhood of Teamsters

The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.

—
2
Washington State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.

—
3
Teamsters Local Union 639

To represent members and provide bargaining services.

—
4
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union 137

Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.

—
5
Transport Workers Union of America

None

—
6
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffers Warehousemen Local No 554

The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.

—
7
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010

To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.

—
8
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 27 Afl-Cio

To conduct a local union of persons engaged in the performance of work within its jurisdiction; to organize, unite, and assist persons, without regard to race, creed, color, sex, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation, or national…

—
9
Laborers International Union Local 4

Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits

—
10
American Federation of Labor Ohio Afl-Cio

To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…

—
11
International Brotherhood of 856 Tcwh Freight Checkers Clerical

Labor Union

—
12
San Diego and Imperial Counties Labor Council Afl-Cio

The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund; the most unlike its peers is Peggy Browning Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teamsters All Charities Fund: $99,700 · OtherTeamsters All Charities FundTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $42,696 · OtherTeamsters' Joint Council No 7San Franciscans for Fair Rates - Yes on F: $40,000 · OtherSan Franciscans for Fair Rates - Yes on FSan Francisco Labor Council: $33,750 · OtherSan Francisco Labor CouncilAFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL: $9,500 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO FOR LONDON BREED 2018: $9,500 · Other+1 more: $5,500 · OtherINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $10,000 · EducationINTERNATION…JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $8,000 · EducationJAMES R HOF…Teamsters Local Union 769 Scholarship Fund: $5,500 · EducationTeamsters L…PEGGY BROWNING FUND: $5,500 · EducationPEGGY BROWN…Working Partnerships Inc: $10,000 · EmploymentWorking Partnerships USA: $8,500 · Health
Other$240,646Education$29,000Employment$10,000Health$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTeamsters All Charities Fund: $99,700 over 7y, 6.6% of budgetTeamsters' Joint Council No 7: $42,696 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSan Francisco Labor Council: $33,750 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWorking Partnerships Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWorking Partnerships USA: $8,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTeamsters Local Union 769 Scholarship Fund: $5,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Federation of Labor: $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…International Brother…Teamsters Automotive …International Brother…
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010CA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home