· Public charity
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010
To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 47% of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $63,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $75,450 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,450 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Teamsters Scholarship Fund | $20,000 |
| ALL CHARITIES AND SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $20,000 |
| ALL CHARITIES TEAMSTERS | $10,000 |
| Teamster National Black Caucus | $6,500 |
| LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 54% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATeamsters All Charities Fund5× · 2019–2024 · $51k · revenue +48%
- LALOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY3× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +65%
- YHYOUTH HELPERS INC2× · 2022–2023 · $21k · revenue +151%
Funded once
- TJTeamsters' Joint Council No 7graduatedone grant, 2020 · $44k · revenue +38%
Alliance for Global Justice Corpone grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +3%- SFSan Francisco Labor Councilgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.
To organize workers for their moral, economic and social advancement.
It is the mission of teamsters local 1932 to provide the best possible service to all our members with integrity and equality; to advance the social, economic, and educational welfare of the membership; to promote professional working…
The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…
The Local Union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights;involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is treated…
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.
To provide support for its members through labor negotiations, collective bargaining agreements and by working towards eliminating unfair labor practices.
Labor Union
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund and the most unlike its peers is Youth Helpers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Teamsters All Charities Fund ↗
- Who funds Teamsters' Joint Council No 7 ↗
- Who funds JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds YOUTH HELPERS INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL 2010 ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS NATIONAL BLACK CAUCUS ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Labor Council ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL COAST LABOR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · Teamsters Local 1932 · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 572 TCWH · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.