· Public charity
International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH
To organize all workers and to secure improved wages, hours, working conditions and other economic advantages through organizing, negotiations, and collective bargaining.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $70,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $167,284 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $96,784 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Teamsters Scholarship Fund | $35,000 |
| LAANE | $15,000 |
| Worker Solidarity and Defense | $15,000 |
| OC Labor Federation AFL-CIO | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY8× · 2017–2024 · $101k · revenue +19%
- LALOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO6× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +19%
- OCORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO4× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- NONo on Prop 22spnrd by Laborone grant, 2020 · $40k
- CCCOLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INCone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -10%
- PBPEGGY BROWNING FUNDone grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.
The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.
Union hall devoted to the betterment of members compensation and working conditions, to secure recognition of workers rights to engage in collective bargaining, and to promote the development and maintenance of on-the-job safety practices…
Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
to organize workers in the laborers international union of north America, afl-cio pacific southwest region through a coordinated program to maintain and improve employment opportunities for affiliated local union members and to recruit new…
The local is a nonprofit organization established to represent its members in wage and fringe benefits matters in the construction industry. the local's primary areas of jurisdiction are oakland and livingston counties.
Labor union representing the electrical worker force
Collective bargaining and representation
Labor union
The local union's mission is to organize and educate workers so that they have a voice in the workplace and know their workplace rights; involve workers in the political process and to negotiate with employers so that each worker is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund and the most unlike its peers is Colette's Children's Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY FEDERATION OF LABOR AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ORANGE COUNTY LABOR FEDERATION AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds The Southern California & Southern Nevada Teamsters JC 42 Charity Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds COLETTE'S CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
- Who funds INLAND EMPIRE LABOR COUNCIL AFL-CIO SAN BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds International Brotherhood of 42 Joint Council ↗
- Who funds Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds Teamsters All Charities Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Teamsters Local 1932 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 063 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson · Teamsters Local 986 Charity Fund Inc · International Brotherhood of 911 TCWH · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.