· Public charity
International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical
Labor Union
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $161,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $246,950 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $85,350 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $31k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Teamsters Scholarship Fund | $125,000 |
| Worker Solidarity and Defense Foundation | $20,000 |
| All Charities Teamsters | $11,000 |
| San Francisco Labor Council | $5,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +96% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFAmerican Federation of Labor2× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +118%
- TLTEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC2× · 2021–2023 · $20k · revenue ×23 · 36% of their budget
- SFSan Francisco Labor Council2× · 2018–2024 · $11k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- CTCoalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIOone grant, 2020 · $60k
- TLTeamsters Local 431one grant, 2018 · $10k
- WFWORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.
To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…
Labor organization
To protect the rights and imrprove the working conditions of working alaskans.
To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.
To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.
None
The organization is a federation of labor unions. its mission is to improve the lives of working families - to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.
The mission of the afl-cio is to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our nation.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.
The Virginia AFL-CIO monitors all legislation affecting the working people of Virginia. To keep the state's labor standards on a progressive track for all working people, we work to win the fight against passage of laws that would have a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Federation of Labor & Alameda Labor Council and the most unlike its peers is 2018 San Francisco Inaugural Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Coalition to Protect Riders and Drivers sponsored by the CA Labor Federation AFL-CIO ↗
- Who funds Teamsters All Charities Fund ↗
- Who funds American Federation of Labor ↗
- Who funds WORKER SOLIDARITY AND DEFENSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS LOCAL 25 AUTISM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Labor Council ↗
- Who funds WORKING FAMILIES ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR & ALAMEDA LABOR COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds 2018 San Francisco Inaugural Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson · Brotherhood of Teamsters Auto Truck drivers Line drivers Car haulers & hel · General Drivers Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union 89 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · Teamsters Union Local 25 Affiliated With Ibt · International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.