· Public charity
Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San
Promote the welfare and working conditions of members of the teamsters local no.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 84% of Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $21,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $109,585 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $88,585 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| All Charities Teamsters | $8,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL | $7,000 |
| TEAMSTERS JOINT COUNCIL NO7 | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATeamsters All Charities Fund6× · 2018–2024 · $80k · revenue -35%
- TJTeamsters' Joint Council No 74× · 2020–2024 · $30k · revenue +38%
- SFSan Francisco Labor Council2× · 2022–2024 · $25k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- SFSan Franciscans for Fair Rates - Yes on Fone grant, 2022 · $40k
- IBINTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +26%
- AHAFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALLone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
To protect and strengthen the rights and conditions of working people and their families.
None
Labor organization for various industries; ensuring fair wages and proper benefits for its members.
The organization is a local teamsters union whose mission is to represent their union members in negotioations with employers.
To advance middle class and working class values by promoting social and economic justice. we join together over 263,000 union members to make our voice heard in the policy and political arenas. the ohio afl-cio represents 1,787 local…
Improvement of Workers Conditions, wages and benefits
To provide scholarships for families of local union members.
Labor Union
Federation of Labor Organizations.
To organize clerical employees of the university of california system in order to secure fair wages and better working conditions.
The primary purposes of the organization are the study of economic and social conditions; the pursuit of policies aimed at effecting a more equal distribution of wealth; and the promotion of full employment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters All Charities Fund and the most unlike its peers is Working Partnerships Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Teamsters All Charities Fund ↗
- Who funds Teamsters' Joint Council No 7 ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Labor Council ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Working Partnerships USA ↗
- Who funds JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Teamsters Local Union 769 Scholarship Fund ↗
- Who funds American Federation of Labor ↗
- Who funds PEGGY BROWNING FUND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen & Helpers · International Brotherhood of 856 TCWH Freight Checkers Clerical · International Brotherhood of Teamsters · International Brotherhood of 396 TCWH · Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 · International Brotherhood of Teamsters Warehouse Wholesale Liquor Salesperson
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.