· Public charity
Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665
Promote the welfare and working conditions of members of teamsters local no.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of TEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $60,775 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $195,620 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $134,845 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| All Charities Teamsters | $17,000 |
| NORTH BAY LABOR COUNCIL | $13,300 |
| NORTH BAY BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES | $6,500 |
| SAN FRANCISCO LABOR COUNCIL | $6,500 |
| JACKIE ELWARD FOR ASSEMBLY 2026 | $5,900 |
| CATHERINE STEFANI FOR ASSEMBLY 2026 | $5,900 |
| San Francisco Building&Construction Trades Council | $5,675 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATeamsters All Charities Fund4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +23%
- AFAmerican Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor Council2× · 2024–2025 · $24k · revenue 0%
- NBNorth Bay Jobs With Justice3× · 2019–2021 · $22k · revenue +623%
Funded once
- TJTeamsters' Joint Council No 7graduatedone grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +38%
- NCNORTH COAST RESIDENT SUPPORTING ROGERS 24one grant, 2024 · $17k
- NFNEWSOM FOR GOVERNOR 2018one grant, 2018 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote the use of union building trades in construction projects in the bay area.
The North Valley Labor Federations mission is to grow and strengthen the labor movement and build a strong political voice for working families in the Northern San Joaquin Valley.
The Labor Council offers an avenue for local unions to come together as one group.
The council is a federation of approximately 85 affiliated unions. the organizaton engages in a wide range of activities. the activities are designed to improve the lives of working families, to bring economic justice to the workplace, and…
To encourage all workers to share equally in the full benefits of union organization and to promulgate the principles ennunciated by the AFL-CIO to encourage workers to promote the principle of free collective bargainin
Member, affiliate, and community education for worker's issues - union and non-union
Assist local unions in representing members in human relations issues.
To benefit local trade unions and their members through education and promotion of union labor to the public.
The council coordinated the efforts of affiliated local unions and assisted their organizations work, bettering the working conditions of their members.
To improve the lives of working families, bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our state and the nation.
The mission of teamsters local 959 is to provide its members with representation in the workplace and to support the interests of labor everywhere.
To improve working conditions of its members and provide benefits of collective bargaining,
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teamsters' Joint Council No 7 and the most unlike its peers is A Home for Everyone Yes on Props 1 and 2. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Teamsters All Charities Fund ↗
- Who funds American Federation of Labor & North Bay Labor Council ↗
- Who funds North Bay Jobs With Justice ↗
- Who funds Teamsters' Joint Council No 7 ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Labor Council ↗
- Who funds JAMES R HOFFA MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC ↗
- Who funds A Home for Everyone Yes on Props 1 and 2 ↗
- Who funds NORTH BAY BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SF BLDG & CONST TRADES COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds TEAMSTERS AUTOMOTIVE & ALLIED WORKERS LOCAL UNION NO 665 ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 2010 · Sanitary Truck Drivers and Helpers San Francisco San Mateo Santa Clara and San
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665?
Find your warmest path to Teamsters Automotive & Allied Workers Local Union No 665 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.