Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$91kPhilanthropy$80kHealth$79kCommunity Improvement$66kEducation$64kCrime & Legal$52kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kRecreation & Sports$26kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 8 grants below total $73,890 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $125,660 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $51,770 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $33k
$8,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.8B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$20,640
CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK HOSPITALS$12,500
CHAMBER SAN MATEO COUNTY$8,000
REDWOOD CITY PARKS AND ARTS FOUNDATION$8,000
SAMCEDA$7,000
REDWOOD CITY SEQUOIA AWARDS INC$6,750
HIP HOUSING$5,500
KAINOS HOME & TRAINING CENTER$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%KAINOS HOME & TRAINING CENTER: $6k → 7%KAINOS HOME & TRAINING CENTER: $6k → 7%KAINOS HOME & TRAINING CENTER: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Monterra Credit Union’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 74% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 70% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Monterra Credit Unionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$468k · 10 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -41% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$468k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-41%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +203%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK
    7× · 2017–2024 · $79k · revenue +31%
  • RC
    Redwood City Police Activities League Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $63k · revenue +359%

Funded once

  • RC
    REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -95%
  • MC
    MONTERRA COMMUNITY FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -100%
  • SM
    San Mateo County Community Colleges Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue +121%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redwood Credit Union

Passionately serving the best interests of our members, employees, and communities. serving all of our members financial service needs.

2
Monterra Credit Union

Passionately deliver relevant products, services, and education tailored to help our members, employees, and communities achieve their financial goals.

Public Benefit
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
Credit Unions in the State of California Sierra Central Credit Union

As your financial institution, we pledge to serve you and our community faithfully. we will be friendly, helpful, and professional, and we will provide great products and competitive rates.

5
Solano Community Foundation

The Solano Community Foundation strengthens Solano County by advancing equity, supporting nonprofit resilience, and expanding access to philanthropy. We serve as a community leader, responsive grantmaker, and trusted partner for donors who…

Philanthropy
6
Monterey County Film Commission

To inspire and facilitate film and media production throughout monterey county, creating positive economic impact.

Arts & Culture
7
Stanislaus Community Foundation

The vision of Stanislaus Community Foundation is that Stanislaus County is a community of choice where people live, work and thrive. To achieve this vision, Stanislaus Community Foundation's mission is to steward charitable resources and…

Philanthropy
8
SFMade Inc

Our mission is to help manufacturers thrive, innovate, and create good jobs, for a more diverse and sustainable Bay Area.

Community Improvement
9
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
10
California Coast Credit Union

California coast credit union (credit union) is a cooperative, organized for the purpose of promoting thrift and savings among its members, creating a source of credit for them at rates of interest set by the board of directors, and…

11
Los Altos Chamber of Commerce

To encourage and promote businesses and to stimulate a vibrant economy in los altos and los altos hills.

12
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Mateo County Economic Development Association Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Fox Theater Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $81,390 · OtherSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION — $80,000 · OtherNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $79,450 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKCHAMBER SAN MATEO COUNTY — $51,240 · OtherCHAMBER SAN MATEO COUNTYREDWOOD CITY SEQUOIA AWARDS INC — $47,250 · OtherREDWOOD CITY SEQUOIA AWARDS INCCity of Redwood City — $20,000 · OtherSAN MATEO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $14,514 · Other+3 more — $20,500 · OtherRedwood City Police Activities League Inc — $63,300 · Crime & LegalRedwood City …REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMONTERRA COMMUNITY FUND — $20,000 · Community ImprovementKainos Home and Training Center for the Developmentally Disabled — $16,500 · Human ServicesSan Mateo County Community Colleges Foundation — $16,300 · EducationREDWOOD CITY PARKS AND ARTS FOUNDATION — $14,750 · Recreation & Sports
Other$394,344Crime & Legal$63,300Philanthropy$20,000Community Improvement$20,000Human Services$16,500Education$16,300Recreation & Sports$14,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $81,390 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $79,450 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetRedwood City Police Activities League Inc — $63,300 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCHAMBER SAN MATEO COUNTY — $51,240 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetREDWOOD CITY SEQUOIA AWARDS INC — $47,250 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTERRA COMMUNITY FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKainos Home and Training Center for the Developmentally Disabled — $16,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSan Mateo County Community Colleges Foundation — $16,300 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREDWOOD CITY PARKS AND ARTS FOUNDATION — $14,750 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $14,514 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetFOX THEATER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY SHERIFFS ACTIVITIES LEAGUE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Atkinson FoundationCA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Atkinson Foundation · Peter Uccelli Foundation · Provident Credit Union · Saga Foundation · Danford Foundation · Sand Hill Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Monterra Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph