Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sammut Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$1.1MPublic Benefit$965kEducation$121kPublic Safety & Disaster$112kHuman Services$66kYouth Development$51kRecreation & Sports$47kCrime & Legal$33kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION$15,000
FRIENDS OF THE SAN BRUNO PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
CORA$10,000
MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%POMEROY RECREATION & REHABILITATION CENTER: $350k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION & REHABILITATION CENTER: $320k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION & REHABILITATION CENTER: $250k → 10%POMEROY RECREATION & REHABILITATION CENTER: $135k → 10%MISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE: $5k → 7%MISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE: $5k → 7%MISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE: $1k → 7%CATHOLIC WORKER HOSPITALITY HOUSE: $1k → 7%SEQUOIA YMCA: $10k → 7%SEQUOIA YMCA: $5k → 7%SEQUOIA YMCA: $5k → 7%SEQUOIA YMCA: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 24 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against -29% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
17

Total granted

$2.4M
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
-29%

Still filing today

46%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyEducationCrime & LegalInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PR
    Pomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.1M · revenue +42%
  • SB
    SAN BRUNO EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $68k · revenue +42%
  • CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse
    5× · 2019–2024 · $40k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • SB
    SAN BRUNO POLICE ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SB
    SAN BRUNO YOUTH BASEBALL
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +2%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usa Softball of Southern California Santee
Recreation & Sports
2
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
3
Sfba

Sfba's main mission is to "bring baseball back to the city" by providing opportunities for youth in sports through competitive team play. our mission facilitieates the opportunity for ballplayers of all skill levels to reach their full…

Recreation & Sports
4
Santa Barbara Soccer Club

Provides youth soccer development and amateur athletic competition through coaching, training and competition.

Recreation & Sports
5
City Fields Foundation
Recreation & Sports
6
San Francisco Police Activities League

The organization supervises amateur athletes as well as other recreational activities for children, serving approximately 1,200 participants.

7
South San Francisco Youth Baseball Managers Association

The purpose of the tax-exempt SSF Youth Baseball is to organize and supervise the playing of youth baseball (Ages 4 to 14) in the City of South San Francisco, CA., as well as providing tournament opportunities in other cities. This…

Unclassified
8
San Francisco United Soccer Club

San Francisco United Soccer Club teaches girls and boys to play the game of soccer with skills well-honed through hard work and patient coaching. The Club fosters collaboration and teamwork bolstered by warm on- and off-the-field…

9
Silicon Valley Community Sports Association

We believe that sports have the power to unite individuals from diverse backgrounds, promote physical fitness and well-being, and cultivate a spirit of camaraderie and sportsmanship.

Youth Development
10
South Bay Athletic Club
Recreation & Sports
11
San Francisco Youth Soccer

The purpose of this Association shall be to develop, promote and administer the game of soccer among youth (boys and girls under nineteen (19) years of age), regardless of race, color religion, age, sex, or national origin within territory…

Recreation & Sports
12
Silicon Valley Baseball Association Svba

To provide baseball instruction and tournaments for youth.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Bruno Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Worker Hospitality House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr13%5%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr15%18%35–55yr14%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr19%2%20–35yr15%6%35–55yr14%83%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
11%
1,080/10,288

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN MATEO COUNTY SERVICE LEAGUE — $750,000 · OtherSAN MATEO COUNTY SERVICE LEAGUEIndividual grant recipient — $115,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSAN BRUNO POLICE EXPLORER PROGRAM — $65,000 · OtherSAN BRUNO PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS — $47,000 · Other+27 more — $306,025 · Other+27 morePomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center — $1,055,000 · Human ServicesPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center+3 more — $37,000 · Human ServicesSAN BRUNO EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $68,000 · EducationCAPUCHINO HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · EducationMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING — $30,000 · Crime & LegalSAN BRUNO YOUTH BASEBALL — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsSAN MATEO YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE SAN BRUNO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropySAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE — $1,000 · PhilanthropyFOSTER CITY LIONS CHARITIES INC — $500 · PhilanthropyCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$1,283,025Human Services$1,092,000Education$74,000Crime & Legal$30,000Recreation & Sports$22,500Philanthropy$11,500Membership Benefit$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center — $1,055,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetSAN BRUNO EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $68,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse — $40,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetPACIFIC SKYLINE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING — $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION — $30,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN BRUNO YOUTH BASEBALL — $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetTHE SAN BRUNO GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE — $18,700 over 3y, 14% of budgetMISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAN BRUNO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAPUCHINO HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $6,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF DALY CITY — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetSAN MATEO YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION — $2,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC WORKER HOSPITALITY HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCake4kids — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOSTER CITY LIONS CHARITIES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pomeroy Recreation and Rehabilitation Center
  • Who funds SAN BRUNO EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse
  • Who funds PACIFIC SKYLINE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING
  • Who funds SAN MATEO COUNTY HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds SAN BRUNO YOUTH BASEBALL
  • Who funds THE SAN BRUNO GIRLS SOFTBALL LEAGUE
  • Who funds MISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE INC
  • Who funds THE SAN BRUNO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CAPUCHINO HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF DALY CITY
  • Who funds SAN MATEO YOUTH SOFTBALL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FIRST TEE
  • Who funds CATHOLIC WORKER HOSPITALITY HOUSE
  • Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Cake4kids

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Bruno Community FoundationCA20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Bruno Community Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sammut Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph