Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MHealth$591kEducation$341kPhilanthropy$210kAnimals$200kHuman Services$168kInternational$75kArts & Culture$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $444k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $476k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAMP HASC INC$350,000
CENTRAL TX SPCA$150,000
THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY$100,000
STARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$75,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$50,500
EQUEST$50,000
THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL$50,000
RODFEI SHOLOM PRE-SCHOOL$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
FIDF$35,000
THE CADE R ALPARD FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC LIVER DISEASE$30,000
WOMEN'S COUNCIL OF THE DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN$25,000
GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND$25,000
METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
KIDNEY TEXAS INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $50k → 9%FOREFRONT LIVING FDN: $20k → 14%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%FOREFRONT LIVING FDN: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CA
NE
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 22 repeat orgs$545k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
17

Total granted

$2.4M
$92k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+24%

Still filing today

64%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    STARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $405k · revenue +200% · 87% of their budget
  • E
    EQUEST
    4× · 2022–2025 · $71k · revenue +1%
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • DS
    DALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • BAYLOR UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • WO
    WIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Health System of Texas

With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…

Health
2
Dallas College Foundation Inc

Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.

Education
3
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
4
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
9
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Torah Day School of Dallas

Torah Day School of Dallas is a day school for jewish children grades kindergarden through eigth grade along with pre-school for one through four year old jewish children. The school provides a general studies and secular education meeting…

Education
12
Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dell Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Discovery Camps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
18/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMP HASC INC: $1,050,000 · ReligionCAMP HASC INCCENTRAL TX SPCA: $200,000 · OtherCENTRAL TX SPCAJewish Federation of Greater Houston: $85,000 · OtherJewish Federation of Greater Hous…EQUEST: $71,000 · OtherEQUESTCONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM BNAI ISRAEL: $54,000 · OtherCONGREGATION RODFEI SHOLOM BNAI I…Individual grant recipient: $44,000 · OtherRODFEI SHOLOM PRE-SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherBAYLOR SCOTT WHITE DALLAS FDN: $40,000 · Other+35 more: $349,031 · Other+35 moreSTARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $404,500 · EducationSTARR FAMILY JEWISH…The Brookwood Community Inc: $100,000 · EducationThe Brookwood Commu…+5 more: $18,383 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $126,500 · HealthAMERICAN CAN…KIDNEYTEXAS INC: $118,605 · HealthKIDNEYTEXAS …CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S M…NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthNEBRASKA MET…+1 more: $10,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $60,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $50,000 · PhilanthropyGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $50,100 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $45,000 · InternationalRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $20,000 · International
Religion$1,050,000Other$923,031Education$522,883Health$340,105Philanthropy$110,000Human Services$100,100International$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAMP HASC INC: $1,050,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetSTARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL: $404,500 over 4y, 87% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $126,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDNEYTEXAS INC: $118,605 over 4y, 15% of budgetThe Brookwood Community Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJewish Federation of Greater Houston: $85,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUEST: $71,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $60,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $50,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S COUNCIL OF THE DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN: $25,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetRevived Soldiers Ukraine: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDALLAS WOMANS CLUB: $19,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF DALLAS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDELL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe McCombs School of Business Foundation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Christian School: $383 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
  • Who funds STARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEYTEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston ↗
  • Who funds EQUEST ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S COUNCIL OF THE DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS WOMANS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BioBridge Global ↗
  • Who funds DISCOVERY CAMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds WIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Texas Instruments FoundationTX14.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Braverman Family Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sam and Helga Feldman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph