· Private foundation
Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $444k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $476k
- $250k+1 grant · $350k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CAMP HASC INC | $350,000 |
| CENTRAL TX SPCA | $150,000 |
| THE BROOKWOOD COMMUNITY | $100,000 |
| STARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $50,500 |
| EQUEST | $50,000 |
| THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| RODFEI SHOLOM PRE-SCHOOL | $40,000 |
| FIDF | $35,000 |
| THE CADE R ALPARD FOUNDATION FOR PEDIATRIC LIVER DISEASE | $30,000 |
| GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND | $25,000 |
| WOMEN'S COUNCIL OF THE DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN | $25,000 |
| METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| KIDNEY TEXAS INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
22 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $453k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSTARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL4× · 2022–2025 · $405k · revenue +200% · 87% of their budget
- EEQUEST4× · 2022–2025 · $71k · revenue +1%
- CMCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +209%
Funded once
- DSDALLAS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAone grant, 2022 · $13k
- WOWIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INCone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- NTNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +11%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
With more than 1 million patient visits each year, Children's Health is North Texas' leading pediatric health system and among the largest in the nation. For more than a century, our mission has been clear: make life better for children.…
Dallas college foundation enhances the level of achievement and excellence of dallas college by providing scholarships, eliminating barriers that prevent students from attending and graduating, and supporting innovation.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…
Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Torah Day School of Dallas is a day school for jewish children grades kindergarden through eigth grade along with pre-school for one through four year old jewish children. The school provides a general studies and secular education meeting…
To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dell Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Discovery Camps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
- Who funds STARR FAMILY JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds KIDNEYTEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds The Brookwood Community Inc ↗
- Who funds Jewish Federation of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds EQUEST ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds NEBRASKA METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S COUNCIL OF THE DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Revived Soldiers Ukraine ↗
- Who funds DALLAS WOMANS CLUB ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY CAMPS INC ↗
- Who funds WIPE OUT KIDS' CANCER INC ↗
- Who funds Musical Bridges Around the World Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Braverman Family Charitable Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sam and Helga Feldman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.