Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sachs Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$824k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$167k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$1.3MEnvironment$809kAnimals$409kHealth$227kCivil Rights$199kEducation$159kPublic Benefit$100kPhilanthropy$79kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $196k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $602k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THOME NATURE CENTRE$166,666
PAWS CHICAGO$146,500
AMERICAN JEWEISH COMMITTEE$100,000
HOPE CHICAGO$75,000
GOODMAN THEATER$64,073
THE FAMILY INSTITUTE$50,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC$25,000
NIU FOUNDATION$25,000
PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION$20,000
BOULDER MUSEUM OF CONTEMP ART$20,000
USA CYCLING FOUNDATION$15,000
CAHME$14,000
THE HAP FOUNDATION$11,500
YWCA BOULDER COUNTY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAHME: $14k → 7%AMERICAN JEWEISH COMMITTEE: $100k → 17%PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION: $21k → 14%USA CYCLING FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%THOME NATURE CENTRE: $167k → 12%THE HAP FOUNDATION: $12k → 7%THOME NATURE CENTRE: $333k → 8%NIU FOUNDATION: $25k → 13%PAWS CHICAGO: $147k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $99k → 17%PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION: $20k → 14%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $135k → 12%THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%PAWS CHICAGO: $134k → 14%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $25k → 17%PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION: $20k → 14%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $99k → 12%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC: $75k → 8%PAWS CHICAGO: $75k → 14%PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION: $20k → 14%THORNE NATURE EXPERIENCE: $75k → 12%BOULDER JUNIOR CYCLING: $35k → 8%PAWS CHICAGO: $38k → 14%PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION: $20k → 14%MACKINTOSH ACADEMY: $10k → 12%BOULDER JUNIOR CYCLING: $25k → 8%PAWS CHICAGO: $15k → 14%DAIRY ARTS CENTER: $25k → 12%THE FAMILY INSTITUTE: $15k → 8%THE FAMILY INSTITUTE: $50k → 14%DAIRY ARTS CENTER: $25k → 12%MACKINTOSH ACADEMY: $11k → 8%BREAKTHROUGH ALLIANCE OF Colorado: $10k → 12%DAILY ARTS CENTRE: $10k → 8%BOULDER MUSEUM OF CONTEMP ART: $20k → 12%CAHRE: $7k → 8%JourneyCare Foundation: $10k → 14%BOULDER JUNIOR CYCLING: $35k → 12%GOODMAN THEATER: $630k → 14%BIXBY SCHOOL: $8k → 12%GOODMAN THEATER: $440k → 14%YWCA BOULDER COUNTY: $10k → 12%HOPE CHICAGO: $75k → 14%BOULDER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $25k → 12%GOODMAN THEATER: $64k → 14%BOULDER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $10k → 12%GOODMAN THEATER: $43k → 14%GOODMAN THEATER: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 16 repeat orgs$438k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +49% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$3.0M
$213k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+49%

Still filing today

56%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHealthAnimalsEnvironmentCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PAWS CHICAGO
    5× · 2020–2024 · $409k · revenue +210%
  • TE
    THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $309k · revenue +162%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $199k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +49%
  • NY
    NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k
  • MA
    MACKINTOSH ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Colorado Academy

Creating curious, kind, courageous, and adventurous learners and leaders.

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mackintosh Academy and the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough Alliance of Colorado Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GOODMAN THEATER — $1,202,180 · OtherGOODMAN THEATERTHOME NATURE CENTRE — $500,000 · OtherTHOME NATURE CENTREIndividual grant recipient — $95,000 · OtherHOPE CHICAGO INC — $75,000 · OtherNEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $75,000 · Other+22 more — $260,514 · Other+22 morePAWS CHICAGO — $408,917 · AnimalsPAWS CHICAGOTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE — $309,163 · EnvironmentTHORNE ECO…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $198,923 · Civil RightsTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $50,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART — $20,000 · Arts & CulturePARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION — $101,200 · HealthNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $25,000 · HealthNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationMACKINTOSH ACADEMY — $10,000 · EducationLIFE TIME FOUNDATION — $3,000 · Education
Other$2,207,694Animals$408,917Environment$309,163Civil Rights$198,923Arts & Culture$170,000Health$126,200Education$38,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPAWS CHICAGO — $408,917 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE — $309,163 over 2y, 17% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $198,923 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION — $101,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CHICAGO INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetThe Family Institute — $65,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS — $50,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFUND FOR THE NEW SCHOOL BOULDER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) — $21,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBOULDER MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMACKINTOSH ACADEMY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBreakthrough Alliance of Colorado Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetYWCA BOULDER COUNTY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIXBY & ASSOCIATES — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE TIME FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO
  • Who funds THORNE ECOLOGICAL INSTITUTE
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds PARKLAND CENTER FOR CLINICAL INNOVATION
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HOPE CHICAGO INC
  • Who funds The Family Institute
  • Who funds THE DAIRY CENTER FOR THE ARTS
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE NEW SCHOOL BOULDER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation)
  • Who funds BOULDER MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND
  • Who funds MACKINTOSH ACADEMY
  • Who funds Breakthrough Alliance of Colorado Inc
  • Who funds YWCA BOULDER COUNTY
  • Who funds BIXBY & ASSOCIATES
  • Who funds LIFE TIME FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · L & N Andreas Foundation · Community Foundation Boulder County · Impactassetsinc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sachs Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sachs Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sachs Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph