Skip to content

· Private foundation

S Edward Marder Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$106kHuman Services$106kReligion$61kInternational$44kHousing & Shelter$32kFood & Nutrition$29kEducation$23kEmployment$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k24 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$335k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC$12,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$10,000
FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$6,000
PAWS CHICAGO$5,000
EVERGREEN SHARED HOUSING$5,000
CHICAGO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS$4,000
FRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD$3,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$3,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$3,000
HOLY CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH$2,500
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORT$2,000
YOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY$2,000
FEEDING AMERICA$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOBILITY SERVICE DOGS INC: $2k → 8%MOBILITY SERVICE DOGS INC: $2k → 8%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$501k · 31 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
1

Total granted

$501k
$3k

Still filing today

65%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $106k · revenue +111%
  • FR
    FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER D/B/A ADOPTION CENTER OF ILLINOIS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +11%
  • FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
2
University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education
3
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
6
Concordia University Chicago

Steadfast in jesus christ as revealed in the holy scriptures, concordia university chicago promotes academic rigor in its liberal arts and professional programs; grounds students in objective truth, integrity, and excellence; and practices…

Education
7
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
8
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
11
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
12
Chicago Sun-Times Media Inc

Chicago sun-times serves the public interest by strengthening the well-being of our local communities and our democracy through independent local journalism.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Lake County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Off Campus Writers Workshop. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
19/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $55,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHRISTIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORT: $12,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORTTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,000 · OtherMERCY HOME FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: $10,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $8,000 · OtherRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $14,000 · OtherRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION IN…FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $10,000 · OtherFRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD: $8,000 · Other+17 more: $53,100 · Other+17 morePRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $106,000 · Crime & LegalPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SE…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER D/B/A ADOPTION CENTER OF ILLINOIS: $90,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESOURCE CEN…+1 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $28,500 · InternationalFRIENDS O…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $22,000 · Housing & ShelterEvergreen Shared Housing Nfp: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $25,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $3,250 · Food & NutritionYOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC: $21,000 · Employment
Other$209,100Crime & Legal$106,000Human Services$93,000International$43,500Housing & Shelter$32,000Food & Nutrition$28,750Employment$21,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC: $106,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER D/B/A ADOPTION CENTER OF ILLINOIS: $90,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $28,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $25,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $22,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC: $21,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $14,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEvergreen Shared Housing Nfp: $10,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetFRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD: $8,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC: $6,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOCCIDENTAL COLLEGE: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY SERVICE DOGS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetOFF CAMPUS WRITERS WORKSHOP: $3,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetStorycatchers: $2,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PILGRIM CHAMBER PLAYERS: $600 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRAIRIE STATE LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER D/B/A ADOPTION CENTER OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHBUILD LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Evergreen Shared Housing Nfp ↗
  • Who funds FRANK LENTZ FOUNDATION LTD ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds MOBILITY SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds OFF CAMPUS WRITERS WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds Storycatchers ↗
  • Who funds THE PILGRIM CHAMBER PLAYERS ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL13.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization S Edward Marder Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from S Edward Marder Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to S Edward Marder Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to S Edward Marder Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on S Edward Marder Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph