· Private foundation
Ruth and Warren Clark Legacy Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k4 grants · $126k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ADAPTIVE SPORTS CENTER OF CRESTED BUTTE | $70,351 |
| POWERED TO MOVE | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS | $30,000 |
| KINETIC GROOVE | $28,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $27,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $68k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PTPOWERED TO MOVE8× · 2017–2024 · $261k · revenue +139%
- CICHARI-T2000 INC2× · 2017–2018 · $162k · revenue ×61
- RARISE ADVENTURES INC2× · 2017–2018 · $88k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF AMARILLOone grant, 2020 · $35k
- VHVIOLAS HOUSEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +88%
- NFNeuro Fitness Foundationone grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -20%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empower people with disabilities to make life choices through individualized interdisciplinary plans of assistance, education, and support.
Operation of a Facility for training the severely handicapped to increase thier earning capabilities and to increase opportunities for health and wellness.
To promote the growth, independence, and recovery of the individuals it serves. the organization serves adults with developmental disabilities in their home and in the communities in which they live.
Our mission is to inspire and empower individuals with physical or traumatic impairments by providing an all-inclusive functional fitness training program and fostering a sense of community for adaptive athletes.
North Carolina Adapted Sports provides adapted sports opportunities for people with a physical disability and advocates for access to an outdoor active lifestyle.
Enabling Movement Foundation is a 501 c (3) organization established to help support the health and wellbeing of the disabled population by providing community programs with specialized equipment to enable safe movement. These programs…
The organization serves individuals with intellectual and development disabilities. services include person-centered (agency and family), day habilitation, respite, supported employment, service coordination, therapeutic consultant,…
RSVP's mission is to provide outpatient services and medical equipment to people who lack access to these services. RSVP is a multi-disciplinary, coordinated team of healthcare professionals committed to providing high quality…
Support services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Kids Mobility Network provides wheelchairs, adaptive bikes, and other medical equipment to children with disabilities. We serve the uninsured and under-insured families that cannot obtain this necessary and expensive medical equipment…
Opportunity development centers, inc's mission is to empower people with disabilities to achieve their work and life goals.
Axis Project Inc. is a New York City-based 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to empowering people with physical disabilities and seniors to pursue healthy, active, independent, and meaningful lives in the community.Our mission is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Helping Everyone Reach Outstanding Educational Success and the most unlike its peers is Kinetic Groove. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC ↗
- Who funds POWERED TO MOVE ↗
- Who funds CHARI-T2000 INC ↗
- Who funds RISE ADVENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING EVERYONE REACH OUTSTANDING EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
- Who funds Chin Community Ministry ↗
- Who funds METROCREST SERVICES ↗
- Who funds KINETIC GROOVE ↗
- Who funds VIOLAS HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Neuro Fitness Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY PLAN INC ↗
- Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE ↗
- Who funds THE OASIS CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ruth and Warren Clark Legacy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.