Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rowland Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$193k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$342kHealth$251kHousing & Shelter$99kFood & Nutrition$76kInternational$55kCivil Rights$44kEnvironment$42kCommunity Improvement$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $163k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOMEFRONT$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON$10,000
WOODSTOCK COMMUNITY TRUST$7,000
CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS$7,000
TRENTON AREA SOUP KITCHEN$5,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FED OF AMERICA$5,000
RAPP AT HOME$5,000
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION$5,000
SMITH CENTER FOR HEALING$5,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION$5,000
HOMESTEAD NANTUCKET$5,000
JUBILEE HOUSE COMMUNITY$5,000
RAPPAHANNOCK FOOD PANTRY$5,000
CARPENTERS SHELTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $206k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MIKES 5K -CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $5k → 7%COVENANT HOUSE: $12k → 17%CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $19k → 5%ALIVE INC: $5k → 9%WILLING HANDS: $2k → 9%MIKES 5K - CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $3k → 7%CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $10k → 5%ALIVE INC: $5k → 9%MIKES 5K -CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $3k → 7%CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $10k → 5%ALIVE: $5k → 9%MIKES 5K -CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE: $3k → 7%CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $10k → 5%ALIVE INC: $5k → 9%CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $10k → 5%ALIVE INC: $5k → 9%CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS: $7k → 5%RAPP AT HOME: $5k → 10%RAPP AT HOME: $5k → 10%RAPP AT HOME: $5k → 10%RAPP AT HOME: $3k → 10%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $3k → 9%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $2k → 9%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $2k → 9%SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER: $2k → 9%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $20k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
WV
VA
MD
SC
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 39 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
15

Total granted

$711k
$240k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+46%

Still filing today

72%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $66k · revenue +28%
  • HOMEFRONT INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +60%
  • JH
    JUBILEE HOUSE COMMUNITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • SE
    see excel list donees
    one grant, 2020 · $163k
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -40%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +34%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Womens Resource Center of Newport and Bristol Counties

The women's resource center empowers survivors by providing trauma-informed services with equity and compassion while working collaboratively with the community to eliminate the root causes of interpersonal abuse.

Human Services
2
Hunger Free Vermont Inc

To end the injustice of hunger for everyone and prioritize the people most affected by hunger to make a permanent systemic change.

Crime & Legal
3
Transition House Inc

Transition house is a human services agency dedicated to preventing and ending domestic violence. the agency provides a continuum of housing resources and holistic support for survivors of violence and their children, as well as prevention…

—
4
Preble Street

To provide accessible barrier-free services to empower people experiencing problems with homelessness, housing, hunger, and poverty and to advocate for solutions to those problems.

Human Services
5
Nuvance Health

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
6
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
7
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
8
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
9
Western Connecticut Home Care Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
10
Vermont Network Against Domestic an Sexual Violence Inc

The vermont network aims to uproot the causes of domestic and sexual violence in vermont and create a world free of oppression where actions, beliefs and systems support all people to thrive. we accomplish this through our key programs…

Human Services
11
Nha Properties Inc

Provide safe, sanitary, and suitable living accommodations for low, moderate, and middle income persons within nantucket county.

Housing & Shelter
12
Cooperative Development Institute Inc

Develop and train cooperatives to create and sustain democratically owned, cooperative enterprises and networks in the northeast that grow a prosperous and equitable economy.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Great Expectations Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lacuna Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
25/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

see excel list donees: $163,060 · Othersee excel list doneesTHE HOMESTEAD INC OF NANTUCKET: $30,000 · OtherTHE HOMESTEAD INC OF NANTUCKETRAPPAHANNOCK FOOD PANTRY: $25,000 · OtherSMITH CENTER FOR HEALING: $25,000 · OtherSouthern Center for Human Rights: $36,000 · OtherSouthern Center for Human RightsJUBILEE HOUSE COMMUNITY: $25,000 · Other+37 more: $240,500 · Other+37 moreTHE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC: $66,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR GREAT EX…COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC: $60,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGT…ALIVE Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesALIVE IncRAPP AT HOME: $18,000 · Human ServicesRAPP AT HOMEMIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesMIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBS…COVENANT HOUSE: $12,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSESPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $9,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesADDICTION SOLUTIONS OF NANTUCKET INC: $23,000 · HealthNAMI National: $15,000 · HealthVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED: $13,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 · HealthHOMEFRONT INC: $55,000 · EducationNANTUCKET STAR AND THERAPEUTIC ACCESSIBL: $5,000 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $23,000 · Food & NutritionFeeding America: $16,000 · Food & NutritionENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $13,000 · EnvironmentLacuna Corporation: $8,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $7,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentD&R GREENWAY LAND TRUST INC: $3,500 · Environment
Other$544,560Human Services$205,500Health$73,000Education$61,000International$45,000Food & Nutrition$39,000Environment$36,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC: $66,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights: $36,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOMESTEAD INC OF NANTUCKET: $30,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetJUBILEE HOUSE COMMUNITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIVE Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetADDICTION SOLUTIONS OF NANTUCKET INC: $23,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRAPP AT HOME: $18,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $17,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCARPENTER'S SHELTER INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWoodstock Community Trust Inc: $15,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetNAMI National: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA SAFE PLACE INC: $14,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetMIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC: $14,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetVIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED: $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $13,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY LAW CENTER INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY: $9,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLacuna Corporation: $8,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetLAWRENCE HOPEWELL TRAIL CORPORATION: $7,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET STAR AND THERAPEUTIC ACCESSIBL: $5,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetWOMANSPACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT PUBLIC CO: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY TRAILS ALLIANCE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR GREAT EXPECTATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE WASHINGTON DC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds THE HOMESTEAD INC OF NANTUCKET ↗
  • Who funds JUBILEE HOUSE COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIVE Inc ↗
  • Who funds ADDICTION SOLUTIONS OF NANTUCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds TASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds RAPP AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds CARPENTER'S SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds Woodstock Community Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds A SAFE PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIKE'S 5K TO CRUSH SUBSTANCE ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA LEAGUE FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL NEEDS SUPPORT CENTER OF THE UPPER VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds Lacuna Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE HOPEWELL TRAIL CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Nantucket IncMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · The Help for People Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Impactassetsinc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rowland Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rowland Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Disability Law Center Inc: 57% of income from government
  • Womanspace Inc: 47% of income from government
  • A Safe Place Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • D&r Greenway Land Trust Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • New Britain Museum of American Art Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Trails Alliance: 3% of income from government
  • Vermont Public Co: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rowland Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Rowland Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rowland Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph