Skip to content
Rotary International Steamboat Springs at a glance

· Public charity

Rotary International Steamboat Springs

Community service through grants, scholarships, and interaction.

$192k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$49k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$146kYouth Development$85kHealth$74kCommunity Improvement$72kHousing & Shelter$64kEducation$57kPhilanthropy$49kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $48,971, the rows itemized in this filing. The $191,545 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $142,574 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$48,971
Median grant
1
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Northwest Colorado HEalth$48,971
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%ADVOCATES BUILDING PEACEFUL: $64k → 6%LIFT UP: $9k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 4 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$275k
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+36%

Still filing today

75%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2018–2025 · $74k · revenue +179%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO
    3× · 2017–2019 · $68k · revenue +63%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY
    2× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • NR
    NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $134k · revenue +53%
  • BT
    BETTER TOMORROW
    one grant, 2024 · $64k · revenue 0%
  • RC
    ROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue +598% · 60% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Routt County Economic Development Partnership

The purpose(s) of the Partnership is to improve the quality of life and economic well-being across Routt County by: (i) enabling business and job retention to increase employment and improve the public welfare, (ii) promoting and assisting…

Community Improvement
2
Partners in Routt County

We support youth through mentorship, empowerment, and trusted adult engagement so that they can face life's challenges and thrive

Education
3
Ouray County Schools Community Resource Consortium Inc

To inspire Ouray County youth to lead healthy lives. We work in partnership with local schools and community partners to create enriching programs, provide leadership opportunities and build youth's strengths that support their wellbeing…

Human Services
4
Yampatika

Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.

Environment
5
Rocky Mountain Youth Corps

Rocky mountain youth corps is a stepping stone to new opportunities. we inspire young adults to make a positive difference in themselves and their communities. through training and service, corps members discover their potential for…

Religion
6
Routt County Council On Aging Inc

Our mission is to determine the needs of older adults in Routt County and to make every effort to meet those needs with appropriate action.

Human Services
7
Routt County Riders

Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.

Education
8
Community School Collaborative

To provide innovative career exploration and work-based learning opportunities that prepare youth to enter tomorrow's workforce and build fulfilling lives.

Education
9
Elevations Credit Union

Together we create solutions for a better life.

—
10
La Plata Youth Services

La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.

Crime & Legal
11
Routt County Wildfire Mitigation Council

Routt County Wildfire Mitigation Council's main exempt purpose is to create resilient fire-adapted communities to minimize the potential impacts of wildfire. This is done through partnerships, coordination, education, outreach, and…

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Yuba River Charter School

Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Northwest Colo; the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Youth Corps. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDA: $111,674 · OtherYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUN…UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY: $21,047 · OtherUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VAL…Steamboat Springs School District RE-2: $15,000 · OtherSteamboat Springs School Di…NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $133,791 · EducationNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO: $68,434 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLU…ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $16,933 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAIN Y…NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $73,785 · HealthNORTHWEST COL…BETTER TOMORROW: $63,879 · Human ServicesBETTER TOMORR…Lift Up of Routt County: $8,700 · Human ServicesLift Up of Ro…ROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT: $44,222 · Public Safety & DisasterYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $41,553 · Philanthropy
Other$147,721Education$133,791Youth Development$85,367Health$73,785Human Services$72,579Public Safety & Disaster$44,222Philanthropy$41,553

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $133,791 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION: $73,785 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBETTER TOMORROW: $63,879 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT: $44,222 over 1y, 60% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $41,553 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY: $21,047 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $16,933 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLift Up of Routt County: $8,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Craig-Scheckman Famil…Colorado Gives Founda…Mile High United Way …Yampa Valley Medical …United Way of the Yam…Rocky Mountain Health…Anschutz Family Found…Steamboat Springs Edu…Steve and Kelly Bloom…The Simmons FoundationThe Moniker FoundationEl Pomar Foundation
Craig-Scheckman Family FoundationCO22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · United Way of the Yampa Valley · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Steamboat Springs Education Fund · Steve and Kelly Bloom Family Foundation · The Simmons Foundation · The Moniker Foundation · El Pomar Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary International Steamboat Springs funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary International Steamboat Springs. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rotary International Steamboat Springs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home