Loading…
· Public charity
ROTARY INTERNATIONAL STEAMBOAT SPRINGS
Community service through grants, scholarships, and interaction.
$130k
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$64k
Largest
01What you fund
0176% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Education$134kHuman Services$73kYouth Development$62kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kPhilanthropy$42kHealth$25kOther$120k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
caringyouth
2020
—
2021
—
2022
rmyccorpseducationemotionalacutememberstrauma
2023
construction
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$63,879
Median grant
1
States reached
$94k
Total assets
Largest grants
- ADVOCATES BUILDING PEACEFUL$63,879
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$174k · 4 repeat orgs$324k to everyone else
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
4
6
Total granted
$174k
$260k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+63%
+235%
Still filing today
75%
83%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthPublic Safety & DisasterPhilanthropyOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB2× · 2018–2019 · $45k · revenue +63%
- RIROTARY INTERNATIONAL3× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +201%
- RCROUTT COUNTY UNITED WAY2× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- NRNORTH ROUTT CHARTER SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $134k · revenue +555%
- RCROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue +84% · 60% of their budget
YAMPA VALLEY RISEgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $42k · revenue +413%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Rural Communities Resource Center
The Rural Communities Resource Center RCRC is a grassroots non-profit organization in Northeast Colorado. The RCRC provides advocacy, support and education to create systems change and develop programs that promote the physical, emotional…
Human Services
2
Rocky Mountain Youth Corps
Rmyc inspires young adults to make a difference in themselves and their communities. through training and team service, rmyc is a stepping stone to new opportunities. using a crew-based youth corps model, rmyc people and programs help…
Religion
3
Yampa Valley Sustainability Council
The mission of Yampa Valley Sustainability Council (YVSC) is to serve as a leader, resource and catalyst for building a sustainable and resilient Yampa Valley region. We do this through programs, partnerships and education.
Environment
4
Yampatika
Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.
Environment
5
Roaring Fork Valley Wildfire Collaborative
Our mission is to reduce wildfire risk by identifying, prioritizing, and implementing strategic cross-boundary plans and projects aimed at creating fire-resilient landscapes and fire-adapted communities.
Environment
6
Routt County Council On Aging Inc
Our mission is to determine the needs of older adults in Routt County and to make every effort to meet those needs with appropriate action.
Human Services
7
Rocky Mountain Values
Rocky Mountain Values is a Colorado non-profit organization that is made up of real Coloradans fighting to make sure that we can all earn a good living and have a good life no matter our zip code.
—
8
Routt County Riders
Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.
Education
9
Yuba River Charter School
Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…
Education
10
Colorado Youth Outdoors Charitable Trust
Building Relationships through Traditional Outdoor Recreation
Environment
11
Rocky Mountain Youth Medical and Nursing
Provide a full range of high-quality healthcare to under-served and at-risk youth.
Health
12
Mountain Communities Supporting
The Collaborative vision is everyone is part of a healthy, safe, and supportive community with a mission of empowering healthy youth, families, and communities through acceptance, resilience and engagement.
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association and the most unlike its peers is North Routt Community Charter School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Education$133,791Other$119,553Human Services$72,579Youth Development$61,576Public Safety & Disaster$44,222Philanthropy$41,553Health$24,814
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Colorado Gives FoundationCO23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · United Way of the Yampa Valley · Arizona Community Foundation · Steamboat Springs Education Fund · Steve and Kelly Bloom · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ROTARY INTERNATIONAL STEAMBOAT SPRINGS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~20 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +84% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 811754979 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on ROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 20 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 60% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Rotary International Steamboat Springs?
Find your warmest path to Rotary International Steamboat Springs through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines