· Public charity
Rotary International Steamboat Springs
Community service through grants, scholarships, and interaction.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $48,971 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $191,545 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $142,574 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Northwest Colorado HEalth | $48,971 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION4× · 2018–2025 · $74k · revenue +179%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO3× · 2017–2019 · $68k · revenue +63%
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY2× · 2018–2023 · $21k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- NRNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $134k · revenue +53%
- BTBETTER TOMORROWone grant, 2024 · $64k · revenue 0%
- RCROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue +598% · 60% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose(s) of the Partnership is to improve the quality of life and economic well-being across Routt County by: (i) enabling business and job retention to increase employment and improve the public welfare, (ii) promoting and assisting…
We support youth through mentorship, empowerment, and trusted adult engagement so that they can face life's challenges and thrive
To inspire Ouray County youth to lead healthy lives. We work in partnership with local schools and community partners to create enriching programs, provide leadership opportunities and build youth's strengths that support their wellbeing…
Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.
Rocky mountain youth corps is a stepping stone to new opportunities. we inspire young adults to make a positive difference in themselves and their communities. through training and service, corps members discover their potential for…
Our mission is to determine the needs of older adults in Routt County and to make every effort to meet those needs with appropriate action.
Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.
To provide innovative career exploration and work-based learning opportunities that prepare youth to enter tomorrow's workforce and build fulfilling lives.
Together we create solutions for a better life.
La Plata Youth Services, Inc. supports and advocates for youth facing challenges in school, home and court.
Routt County Wildfire Mitigation Council's main exempt purpose is to create resilient fire-adapted communities to minimize the potential impacts of wildfire. This is done through partnerships, coordination, education, outreach, and…
Yuba River Charter School provides K-8 public Waldorf education that nurtures the physical, emotional and intellectual capacities of the child through a developmentally appropriate curriculum. YRCS brings forth the academic, social,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Club of Northwest Colo and the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Youth Corps. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO ↗
- Who funds BETTER TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds ROUTT COUNTY CRISIS SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS ↗
- Who funds Lift Up of Routt County ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · United Way of the Yampa Valley · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Steamboat Springs Education Fund · Steve and Kelly Bloom Family Foundation · The Simmons Foundation · The Moniker Foundation · El Pomar Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rotary International Steamboat Springs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.