Skip to content
Rotary Club of Greater Bend at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rotary Club of Greater Bend

Community service club that provides grants, allocations and, contributions to various entities and individuals

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$321kEducation$178kHuman Services$113kYouth Development$93kHousing & Shelter$84kPhilanthropy$58kHealth$58kFood & Nutrition$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $124,816, the rows itemized in this filing. The $135,316 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $119k
$23,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$102k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REVILLAGE$41,000
ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INT'L$34,052
BEND LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT$23,100
GIFTS OF LESS THAN 5000$21,164
CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEIGHBOR IMPACT: $15k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$662k · 11 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
9

Total granted

$662k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+9%

Still filing today

27%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GO
    GIFTS OF LESS THAN 5000
    9× · 2017–2025 · $162k
  • J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $84k · revenue +76%
  • BI
    BETHLEHEM INN
    2× · 2018–2019 · $76k · revenue -32%

Funded once

  • N
    NEIGHBORIMPACT
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +9%
  • Oregon State University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +42%
  • A
    ABILITREE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
2
Beyond These Walls

Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.

Civil Rights
3
Gleaners of Clackamas County Inc

Provide food to low income families.

—
4
Home Share Oregon

To connect homeowners with a spare bedroom to rent and home seekers in need of affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Bendnext

Bendnext is fully focused on strengthening the entire continuum of workforce development, community/civic leadership and employee education and retention options locally.

Unclassified
7
Oregon Abuse Advocates and Survivors in Service

Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.

Crime & Legal
8
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
9
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
10
Oregon Casa Network

To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child

Human Services
11
LArche Portland

At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…

Human Services
12
Rogue Action Center

Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Bend; the most unlike its peers is Oregon State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GIFTS OF LESS THAN 5000: $161,555 · OtherGIFTS OF LESS THAN 5000J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $83,894 · OtherJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INCBEND-LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $74,117 · OtherBEND-LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICTST SURG LLC: $48,697 · OtherST SURG LLCMOUNTAIN VIEW HIGH SCHOOL: $31,011 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW HIGH SCHOOLBEND HIGH SCHOOL: $31,011 · OtherBEND HIGH SCHOOLSUMMIT HIGH SCHOOL: $31,011 · OtherSUMMIT HIGH SCHOOLGREATER BEND ROTARY FOUNDATION: $20,394 · Other+4 more: $35,852 · Other+4 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $320,772 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY I…REVILLAGE: $75,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNITY: $9,526 · Youth DevelopmentBETHLEHEM INN: $76,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER BEND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $29,576 · PhilanthropyDAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC: $8,400 · PhilanthropyNEIGHBORIMPACT: $15,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $5,500 · Human ServicesOregon State University Foundation: $11,000 · EducationTHE GIVING PLATE: $7,894 · Food & Nutrition
Other$517,542International$320,772Youth Development$84,526Housing & Shelter$76,000Philanthropy$37,976Human Services$20,500Education$11,000Food & Nutrition$7,894

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $320,772 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC: $83,894 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $76,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER BEND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $29,576 over 3y, 44% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILITREE: $9,526 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND: $9,526 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
  • Who funds REVILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BEND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ABILITREE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND ↗
  • Who funds DAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SHOWER TRUCK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …United Way of Deschut…St Charles Health Sys…The Anjulicia Foundat…The Autzen FoundationMaybelle Clark Macdon…First Interstate Banc…Joseph M Schenck Foun…Dziuban FoundationBend FoundationOnpoint Community Cre…The Roundhouse Founda…
The Oregon Community FoundationOR23.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · St Charles Health System Inc · The Anjulicia Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Joseph M Schenck Foundationinc · Dziuban Foundation · Bend Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Roundhouse Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rotary Club of Greater Bend funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rotary Club of Greater Bend. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 27%
  • J Bar J Youth Services Inc: 71% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact: 68% of income from government
  • Abilitree: 44% of income from government
  • Dawns House Corporation Llc: 27% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon: 2% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rotary Club of Greater Bend’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home