Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dziuban Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$42kHealth$16kHousing & Shelter$8kYouth Development$8kAnimals$7kRecreation & Sports$7kFood & Nutrition$7kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$600k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
M Lamb$6,500
STREET DOG HERO$2,500
OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE INC$2,000
CHASING THE RAINBOWS$2,000
MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC$2,000
YOUTH OUTLOOK$2,000
BETHLEHEM INN$1,000
CENTRAL OREGON TRAIL ALLIANCE$1,000
GIVING PLATE$1,000
CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON$500
HUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL OREGON SPCA$500
MEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB$500
DESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY$500
HIGH DESERT FOOD & FARM ALLIANCE$500
OREGON NORDIC CLUB$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHASING THE RAINBOWS: $2k → 9%MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC: $2k → 13%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $3k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $1k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $1k → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $500 → 10%CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON: $500 → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND ST FRANCIS CONFERE: $3k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND ST FRANCIS CONFERE: $1k → 10%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND ST FRANCIS CONFERE: $1k → 10%FURNISH HOPE: $500 → 10%FURNISH HOPE: $500 → 10%FURNISH HOPE: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
NY
OR
NV
PA
CA
VA
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$59k · 18 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
17

Total granted

$59k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $11k · revenue +74%
  • J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +48%
  • SD
    STREET DOG HERO
    4× · 2022–2025 · $5k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • SM
    S Mortensen
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
  • TK
    T Kealey
    one grant, 2024 · $7k
  • JL
    J Lamb
    one grant, 2024 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Dog Rescue

Conduct rescue of dogs, facilitate adoptions of same. provide emergency vet services for dogs needing rescue

Animals
2
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
3
Herding Dog Rescue of Central Oregon

Our mission is to help herding dogs who are abandoned, neglected and abused or simply in the wrong home into a loving appropriate home.

Animals
4
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Oregon Dachshund Rescue Inc

The mission of Oregon Dachshund Rescue Inc is to locate the best homes possible for Dachshunds who have been neglected, abused, injured or surrendered to shelters at which there is risk of being euthanized.

Animals
7
Bend Visitor & Convention Bureau Dba Visit Bend

Develop tourism industry in bend,oregon

8
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
9
Oregon Desert Land Trust

To conserve and restore wild and working lands in oregons high desert for wildlife and people, and provide common ground to improve climate resilience, wildlife connectivity, habitat restoration, innovative grazing practices, cultural…

Environment
10
Bend Spay & Neuter Project

The mission of bend spay and neuter project is to provide affordable, preventative veterinary care to at risk cats and dogs in central oregon in order to create a more humane community.

11
Oregon Cancer Foundation

Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.

Health
12
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Bend and the most unlike its peers is Aveni Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#13#1#20#5#17
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%3%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr19%34%20–35yr12%11%35–55yr16%6%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%3%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr19%31%20–35yr12%12%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
11%
2,771/25,395

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
16/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

S Mortensen — $6,500 · OtherS MortensenT Kealey — $6,500 · OtherT KealeyJ Lamb — $6,500 · OtherJ LambM Lamb — $6,500 · OtherM LambJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC — $5,500 · OtherJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INCTHE CROSSING A CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherTHE CROSSING A CHRISTIAN CHURCHMEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB — $1,900 · OtherTHE OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE INC — $2,000 · OtherYOUTH OUTLOOK — $2,000 · Other+12 more — $8,700 · Other+12 moreCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON — $6,000 · Human ServicesCASA OF CENTRAL O…ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND - ST FRANCIS CONFERENCE — $5,000 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAU…CHASING THE RAINBOWS — $2,000 · Human ServicesCHASING THE RAINB…MEDICAL DEBT RESOLUTION INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDICAL DEBT RESO…FURNISH HOPE INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesFURNISH HOPE INCST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,500 · HealthST JUDE CHIL…HEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC — $1,000 · HealthHEALING REIN…CaringBridge — $500 · Health+1 more — $100 · HealthBETHLEHEM INN — $6,000 · Housing & ShelterKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE GIVING PLATE — $4,000 · Food & NutritionHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance — $1,600 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE — $1,000 · Food & NutritionSTREET DOG HERO — $4,500 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL OREGON — $2,000 · AnimalsCentral Oregon Trail Alliance — $2,500 · EnvironmentDESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY — $1,250 · EnvironmentDeschutes Land Trust — $1,000 · Environment1 FOR THE PLANET INC — $250 · Environment
Other$51,100Human Services$16,500Health$12,100Housing & Shelter$8,000Food & Nutrition$6,600Animals$6,500Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON — $6,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN — $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC — $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY BEND - ST FRANCIS CONFERENCE — $5,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTREET DOG HERO — $4,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GIVING PLATE — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Oregon Trail Alliance — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHASING THE RAINBOWS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetKOR COMMUNITY LAND TRUST DBA ROOTEDHOMES — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF CENTRAL OREGON — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OFFICER DOWN MEMORIAL PAGE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMEISSNER NORDIC SKI CLUB — $1,900 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance — $1,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBend Endurance Academy — $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFURNISH HOPE INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND — $1,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDESCHUTES RIVER CONSERVANCY — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBend Heroes Foundation — $1,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDeschutes Land Trust — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE SQUARE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON NORDIC CLUB — $1,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHEALING REINS EQUINE ASSISTED SERVICES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH DESERT MUSEUM — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1 FOR THE PLANET INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGolden Bond Rescue of Oregon Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKES FOR KIDS FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVENI FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR32.7× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Anjulicia Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · The Roundhouse Foundation · Bend Foundation · The Crevier Family Foundation · Willard L & Ruth P Eccles Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc · Barbara Emily Knudson Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dziuban Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 45%
  • Deschutes River Conservancy100% of income from government
  • J Bar J Youth Services Inc71% of income from government
  • Kor Community Land Trust Dba Rootedhomes63% of income from government
  • Deschutes Land Trust46% of income from government
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance45% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Veterans Ranch45% of income from government
  • High Desert Museum11% of income from government
  • Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc11% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon2% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Trail Alliance1% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dziuban Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dziuban Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph