· Public charity
Rotary Club of Greater Bend
Community service club that provides grants, allocations and, contributions to various entities and individuals
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $124,816 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $135,316 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $119k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REVILLAGE | $41,000 |
| ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INT'L | $34,052 |
| BEND LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT | $23,100 |
| GIFTS OF LESS THAN 5000 | $21,164 |
| CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GOGIFTS OF LESS THAN 50009× · 2017–2025 · $162k
J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC4× · 2019–2022 · $84k · revenue +76%- BIBETHLEHEM INN2× · 2018–2019 · $76k · revenue -32%
Funded once
- NNEIGHBORIMPACTone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +9%
Oregon State University Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +42%- YYOUNITYone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.
Beyond These Walls supports LGBTQ people impacted by incarceration in Oregon by providing direct service housing and advocacy.
Provide food to low income families.
To connect homeowners with a spare bedroom to rent and home seekers in need of affordable housing
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Bendnext is fully focused on strengthening the entire continuum of workforce development, community/civic leadership and employee education and retention options locally.
Providing support and advocacy for abuse survivors.
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child
At l'arche portland people with and without developmental disabilities create home and build community together. we nurture long-term mutual relationships that reveal the gifts of people with developmental disabilities. in doing so we…
Our mission is to grow organizing power and leaders for a more just and thriving Southern Oregon.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Assistance League of Bend and the most unlike its peers is Oregon State University Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds REVILLAGE ↗
- Who funds GREATER BEND ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNITY ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BEND ↗
- Who funds ABILITREE ↗
- Who funds DAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SHOWER TRUCK INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
- Who funds CASA OF CENTRAL OREGON ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · St Charles Health System Inc · The Anjulicia Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Joseph M Schenck Foundationinc · Dziuban Foundation · Bend Foundation · Onpoint Community Credit Union · The Roundhouse Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rotary Club of Greater Bend funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Abilitree — 44% of income from government
- Dawns House Corporation Llc — 27% of income from government
- Casa of Central Oregon — 2% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.