Loading…
· Private foundation
ROTARY CLUB OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$15k
Granted FY2025
32
Grants
6
Communities
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of ROTARY CLUB OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2023
—
2024
citizen awarddistinguish citizenguest speakerrechartertroopscholarships
2025
guest speakerrechartertroopscholarshipsdistrictdistinguished citizen
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2025 · 32 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$100
Median grant
6
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Keller Center for Advanced Learning$5,000
- Rotary International Foundation$1,350
- Nina Alvarez Medical Assitance$1,100
- Little by Little$1,100
- Shelter Box USA$1,000
- Keller ISD Council of PTAs$1,000
- Rotary Internation District 5790$900
- Disaster Aid USA$600
- Gallant Few$600
- Nathan Gage Ingram Foundation$200
- Freedom Mobility Foundation$100
- Tarrant Food Bank$100
- Crew 1910$100
- American Cancer Society in Texas$100
- Troop 1920$100
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$23k · 16 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +147% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
16
24
Total granted
$23k
$6k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+147%
+40%
Still filing today
13%
17%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesPublic BenefitPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KCKeller Center for Advanced Learning2× · 2024–2025 · $9k
- KIKeller ISD Council of PTAs2× · 2024–2025 · $3k
- RIRotary Internation District 57902× · 2024–2025 · $2k
Funded once
- SJSt Jude Children's Research Hospita2× · 2024–2025 · $1k
- TCTarrant County Food bankone grant, 2023 · $1k
- RIRotary Internationalone grant, 2023 · $600
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Warrior Built Foundation Inc
Organized operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans.
Health
2
Lifewater Inc
Lifewater International is a non-profit Christian water development organization.
Environment
3
Texas Water Mission Inc
The Texas Water Mission supports communities in need by providing safe drinking water and hygiene solutions.
International
4
Troops Direct
Troops Direct augments the United States military supply chain by providing American forces with critically needed items that cannot be accessed through conventional government channels.
Philanthropy
5
Water to Thrive
Water to Thrive transforms lives in rural Africa by working with partners and beneficiaries to bring the blessing of clean, safe water, connecting communities in need with supporters who have the heart and spirit to make a difference
International
6
Water With Blessings
Mothers and Missioners who bring clean water to God's thirsty children
Human Services
7
Companions for Heroes
To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.
Human Services
8
Heroes Care Inc
A collaborate effort among well established non-governmental organizations designed to provide complete and proactive support for members of all branches of the military and their families through pre-deployment, deployment, family…
Public Benefit
9
Warrior Reunion Foundation
Supports combat veterans in overcoming the challenges of post-military transition by reconnecting those who served together overseas through the execution of recovery reunions.
Public Benefit
10
Wounded Warrior Homes Inc
Wounded warrior homes provides post 9/11 wounded veterans struggling with traumatic brain injury and/or post traumatic stress disorder with supportive transitional houseing and a host of comprehensive re-intergrative services.
Human Services
11
World Wide Wells Foundation Inc
Outreach ministry providing humanitarian aid to those in need.
International
12
Helping a HeroOrg
Provide adapted homes and emergency financial aid to severely wounded heroes injured in the expanded war on terror. Give marriage and caregiver support, provide recreational activities, and facilitate community support.
Philanthropy
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Transforming Lives and the most unlike its peers is Speedway Children's Charities. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
14 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$27,206Human Services$3,300Public Benefit$200Philanthropy$200International$100Health$100
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ROTARY CLUB OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Keller Lions Club.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 756050626 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Keller Lions Club, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Rotary Club of Golden Triangle Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Rotary Club of Golden Triangle Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines