Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosswood Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$175k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.9MEducation$2.9MHuman Services$635kHealth$308kHousing & Shelter$265kInternational$145kCivil Rights$118kEmployment$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $278k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $985k
$35,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRC NA INC$175,000
MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS$120,000
AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE$100,000
DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY$90,000
MOUNT ROYAL ACADEMY$85,000
CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION$80,000
DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY$80,000
ST MICHAEL HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
FOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION$70,000
CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF VERO BEACH$60,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
CARING CENTER FOR WOMEN$40,000
BENEDICTINE COLLEGE$35,000
CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY$35,000
NASAREANORG$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%CARING CENTER FOR WOMEN: $60k → 12%ST MICHAEL HIGH SCHOOL: $75k → 9%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $90k → 14%CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION: $125k → 13%AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 4%MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS: $120k → 8%FOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION: $70k → 7%ST MICHAEL HIGH SCHOOL: $70k → 9%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $80k → 14%CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION: $125k → 13%AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE: $100k → 8%DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 4%FOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION: $60k → 7%MOUNT ROYAL ACADEMY: $85k → 10%MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS: $120k → 6%ST MICHAEL THE ARCHANGEL REGIONAL: $67k → 9%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $75k → 14%CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION: $100k → 13%AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE: $75k → 8%DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 4%MOUNT ROYAL ACADEMY: $80k → 10%MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS: $100k → 6%FRIENDS OF ST MICHAEL: $60k → 9%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $75k → 14%CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION: $100k → 13%AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE: $75k → 8%DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY: $80k → 4%MOUNT ROYAL ACADEMY: $75k → 10%MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS: $100k → 6%DOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $75k → 14%LEGION OF CHRIST: $90k → 13%AUGUSTINE INSTITUTE: $75k → 8%DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY: $80k → 4%MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS: $80k → 6%CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION: $80k → 13%DIVINE MERCY UNIVERSITY: $75k → 4%MATER ECCLESIA FUND FOR VOCATIONS: $80k → 6%CRC NA INC: $175k → 4%CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION: $70k → 13%CRC NA INC: $160k → 4%MAGDALEN COLLEGE: $150k → 7%CRC NA INC: $150k → 4%MAGDALEN COLLEGE: $150k → 7%REGNUM CHRISTI CONSECRATED WOMEN: $150k → 4%MAGDALEN COLLEGE: $150k → 7%CRC NA INC: $150k → 4%MATER ECCLESIAE INC: $100k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
MI
NY
OH
PA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 47% of Rosswood Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Rosswood Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.0M · 34 repeat orgs$488k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
8

Total granted

$7.0M
$473k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TI
    The Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $625k · revenue +144%
  • ME
    MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $550k · revenue +386%
  • Augustine Institute Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $516k · revenue +321%

Funded once

  • RC
    REGNUM CHRISTI CONSECRATED WOMEN
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • ME
    MATER ECCLESIAE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • LO
    LEGION OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $90k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chesterton Academy of St Philip Neri

Inspired by Saint Pope John Paul II, we take as our motto Cultura Vitae, the culture of life, as our students triumph over the materialism and despair that pervades our culture in order to have life and have it abundantly. We do this with…

Education
2
Chesterton Academy of Milw Inc

An education with a rigorous classical curriculum taught through the lens of the Catholic faith.

Education
3
Chesterton Academy of the Immaculata Inc

Under the patronage of our Blessed Mother, Chesterton Academy of the Immaculata seeks to partner with parents in forming young men and women to be joyful leaders and saints. We cultivate Christian virtues and guide students in the pursuit…

Education
4
Chesterton Academy of Rochester

To partner with parents to raise a generation of joyful leaders and saints, educated in the classical, liberal arts tradition and the truths of the Catholic faith. Students will abound in the skills and character requisite for success in…

Education
5
Chesterton Academy of Saint John the Evangelist

The mission of Chesterton Academy is to help parents raise up a new generation of joyful leaders and saints, educated in the classical tradition and the truths of the Catholic faith.

Education
6
Ave Maria University Inc

University education grounded in the traditions and faith of the roman catholic church

Education
7
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
8
Chesterton Academy of St Louis

Under the patronage of G.K. Chesterton and in partnership with families and the Church, the mission of Chesterton Academy of St. Louis is to foster a Culture of Life by forming a new generation of joyful leaders and saints, educated in the…

Education
9
St Peter Catholic

St. Peter Catholic High School empowers students to be models of faith through Catholic spiritual formation, while providing a creative and comprehensive education in career and technical pathways.

Education
10
Aquinas Classical Academy

Aquinas Classical Academy is an independent high school, obedient to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church.

Education
11
St Therese Academy

Guided by Christian faith, St. Therese Academy guides students with Montessori, Catechesis of the Good Shepherd and classical principles to live out the gospel message, achieve academic excellence, and joyfulluy lead by faith, virtue and…

—
12
Chesterton Academy of Fort Worth

To inspire and influence the culture in Fort Worth by joyfully engaging our students with the classics, which are the foundation of Western civilization and point to the most important historical even of humanity, the Incarnation of our…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cardinal Newman Society for the Preservation of Catholic Hgr Ed; the most unlike its peers is Benedictine College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC WORLD MISSION INC: $655,000 · OtherCATHOLIC WORLD MISSION INCCRC NA INC: $635,000 · OtherCRC NA INCDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARY: $505,000 · OtherDOMINICAN SISTERS OF MARYCARING CENTER FOR WOMEN: $280,000 · OtherCARING CENTER FOR WOMENIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherREGNUM CHRISTI CONSECRATED WOMEN: $150,000 · OtherST MICHAEL HIGH SCHOOL: $145,000 · OtherCATHOLIC NEAR EAST WELFARE ASSOC INC: $145,000 · Other+19 more: $995,100 · Other+19 moreThe Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc: $625,000 · EducationThe Institute for the Psychological Scienc…Augustine Institute Inc: $516,000 · EducationAugustine Institute IncMAGDALEN COLLEGE: $470,000 · EducationMAGDALEN COLLEGEMount Royal Academy Inc: $446,300 · EducationMount Royal Academy IncFOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION INC: $380,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION INCFRIENDS OF ST MICHAEL: $120,000 · EducationCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF VERO BEACH INC: $110,000 · Education+5 more: $155,000 · Education+5 moreMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $550,000 · ReligionMATER ECCL…CHURCH MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $79,460 · ReligionCHURCH MUS…NASAREANORG INC: $75,000 · ReligionNASAREANOR…CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED: $265,000 · Housing & ShelterLIVE ACTION: $17,500 · Civil Rights
Other$3,660,100Education$2,822,300Religion$704,460Housing & Shelter$265,000Civil Rights$17,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc: $625,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetMATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC: $550,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetAugustine Institute Inc: $516,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMAGDALEN COLLEGE: $470,000 over 5y, 5.6% of budgetMount Royal Academy Inc: $446,300 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION INC: $380,000 over 7y, 68% of budgetCARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED: $265,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF ST MICHAEL: $120,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetCHESTERTON ACADEMY OF VERO BEACH INC: $110,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetThe Human Life Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetBenedictine College: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $79,460 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetNASAREANORG INC: $75,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetMOUNT ROYAL ACADEMY NORTH INC: $35,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetVille de Marie Academy Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCARDINAL NEWMAN ACADEMY: $20,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN PAUL II PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMING HOME NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Institute for the Psychological Sciences Inc ↗
  • Who funds MATER ECCLESIAE FUND FOR VOCATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds Augustine Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAGDALEN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Mount Royal Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ST MICHAEL ↗
  • Who funds CHESTERTON ACADEMY OF VERO BEACH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Human Life Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds CHURCH MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NASAREANORG INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ROYAL ACADEMY NORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds Ville de Marie Academy Inc ↗
  • Who funds CARDINAL NEWMAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Moran FoundationNV13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Moran Foundation · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosswood Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosswood Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rosswood’s filings →

    More from the funding graph