Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rossow Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$107kHuman Services$36kEducation$30kHealth$16kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$3kCivil Rights$3kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $16k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$16,115
TEMPLE EMANUEL$8,991
JOSEPH SCHOOL$2,550
COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION$1,040
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,000
Individual grant recipient$923
CLOTHES TO KIDS DENVER$250
ROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HEAVY HANDS HEAVY HEARTS FOUNDATION: $100 → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $16k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $10k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS DENVER: $500 → 12%CLOTHES TO KIDS DENVER: $250 → 12%Wish Of A Lifetime: $55 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
IN
CA
CO
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$122k · 16 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
32

Total granted

$122k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+76%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $34k · revenue +39%
  • MR
    MARKETING RESEARCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +10%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation
    3× · 2018–2020 · $2k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • AE
    ALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +77%
  • TF
    THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +162%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
2
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
7
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
8
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
International Myeloma Foundation

Dedicated to improving the quality of life of myeloma patients while working toward prevention and a cure.

Unclassified
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

12
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Murray Bowen Archives Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsCommunity FoundationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Christian Missionary Organi…Food Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr21%24%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr12%18%35–55yr13%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr21%23%10–20yr17%47%20–35yr12%6%35–55yr13%25%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/36
the rest of the field
13%
4,367/33,381

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
27/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISHColorado — $70,304 · PhilanthropyJEWISHColoradoCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $2,590 · Philanthropy+4 more — $2,249 · PhilanthropyTEMPLE EMANUEL — $34,313 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELIndividual grant recipient — $5,062 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,600 · Other+24 more — $7,437 · Other+24 moreJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $33,651 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVI…THE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,500 · Human Services+3 more — $905 · Human ServicesThe Joseph School Inc — $23,842 · EducationThe Joseph Schoo…MARKETING RESEARCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,650 · EducationMARKETING RESEAR…STANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL — $2,178 · EducationSTANLEY BRITISH …ALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION — $1,015 · Education+1 more — $150 · EducationGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $8,329 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $2,200 · HealthQSAC INC — $1,803 · HealthTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,000 · Health+6 more — $1,257 · HealthJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $500 · InternationalMOISHE HOUSE — $1,500 · Religion
Philanthropy$75,143Other$49,412Human Services$36,056Education$29,835Health$15,589International$2,500Religion$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISHColorado — $70,304 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC — $33,651 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Joseph School Inc — $23,842 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetGLOBAL DOWN SYNDROME FOUNDATION — $8,329 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMARKETING RESEARCH EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC — $2,650 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $2,590 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTANLEY BRITISH PRIMARY SCHOOL — $2,178 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQSAC INC — $1,803 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOISHE HOUSE — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOULDER JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA EPSILON PI FOUNDATION — $1,015 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRose Community Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLOTHES TO KIDS OF DENVER INC — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLF FIGHTS CANCER INC — $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC — $499 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIFT OF LIFE MARROW REGISTRY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $272 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $232 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $154 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMurray Bowen Archives Project — $150 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHEAVY HANDS HEAVY HEARTS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLive Like Bella Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC — $55 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rossow Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rossow Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rossow Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph