· Private foundation
Ee Murry Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $118k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $957k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $230,000 |
| TOWN BRANCH PARK | $200,000 |
| CIVIC LEX | $110,000 |
| LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $67,000 |
| FOOD CHAIN | $50,375 |
| HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY CARE | $50,000 |
| BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS | $50,000 |
| THE HEARING AND SPEECH CENTER | $50,000 |
| THE LEXINGTON SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $45,000 |
| LEXARTS | $35,000 |
| FAYETTE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $28,177 |
| MOUNT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY | $10,000 |
| UK MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $836k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCHOICES HEALTHCARE5× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +56%
- TBTOWN BRANCH PARK INC3× · 2021–2024 · $800k · revenue +8%
- WSWATER STREET MINISTRIES3× · 2018–2020 · $430k · revenue +85%
Funded once
- NCNOLI COMMUNITY DEV CORPone grant, 2017 · $125k
- AYARBOR YOUTHone grant, 2018 · $30k
- DCDAYSPRING CHRISTIAN ACADEMYgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +339%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
LPC's mission is to help children become good friends, proficient problem solvers, creative risk takers, and self-governing, accepting classmates. We want them to be as self-sufficient and independent as they can be based on their age and…
Our mission is to enrich and connect our community through welcoming spaces, engaged staff, diverse resources, and lifelong learning opportunities. we create a stronger community by meeting our customers where and how they need us and…
To represent our members, creating the environment and opportunity for economic prosperity and quality living in central kentucky.
To provide professional theatre experiences for young audiences. to provide quality theatre education for young people annually. lct provides quality theatre experiences and theatre arts education for as many as 150,000 children throughout…
To provide a qualified and compassionate court-appointed volunteer advocate to every child who is abused and neglected, to ensure the fundamental human right of having a safe, nurturing, and permanent home is met.
The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.
Community action council for lexington-fayette, bourbon, harrison, and nicholas counties, inc. prevents, reduces, and eliminates poverty among individuals, families, and communities through direct services and advocacy.
Serves as an advocate for business by fostering economic growth and prosperity for the benefit of the lexington community.
Kendal at lexington, a not-for-profit life plan community, grounded in quaker values, provides opportunities for a diverse population of older adults from the lexington, buena vista, and rockbridge county, virginia areas and beyond, to…
Lpm provides independent and courageous news, music and experiences that serve the needs and aspirations of our diverse communities.
Children's advocacy centers of kentucky, inc. seeks to build relationships at the state and national levels by collaborating with partners which will benefit the work of kentucky child advocacy centers.
Provides community service(family counseling & day care) to the inner of louisville.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lexarts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Allegro Dance Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHOICES HEALTHCARE ↗
- Who funds TOWN BRANCH PARK INC ↗
- Who funds WATER STREET MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Step by Step Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds FOODCHAIN INC ↗
- Who funds LEXARTS INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
- Who funds CIVICLEX INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds NOLI CDC CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE BLUEGRASS INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds LEXINGTON HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC DBA THE HEARING & SPEECH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY MARKEY CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER SCIENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds DAYSPRING CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ARBOR YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MT HOPE NAZARENE RETIREMENT COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Seedleaf Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFE HAVEN BABY BOXES INC ↗
- Who funds Kentucky Aquatics ↗
- Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · American Water Charitable Foundationinc · Honorable Order of Kentucky Colonels Inc · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Christian Word Ministries Inc · United Way of the Bluegrass Inc · LG&E and Ku Foundation Inc · Rosenstein Family Charitable Foundation Inc · The Mt Brilliant Family Foundation (Formerly Hgg Family Foundation) · Baird Foundation Inc · Keeneland Foundation Inc · Elhapa Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ee Murry Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.