Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosenheim Family Charit Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.2MArts & Culture$241kEducation$76kHealth$73kFood & Nutrition$72kEnvironment$55kHousing & Shelter$25kCivil Rights$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $110k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.1M
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARLES SCHWAB DONOR ADVISORY FD$1,135,454
SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$25,000
FOOD OUTREACH$15,000
KETCCHANNEL 9$15,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ST LOUIS$15,000
GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES$15,000
ST LOUIS FOOD BANK$15,000
MSSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN$10,000
ST LOUIS ART MUSEUM$5,000
OPERA THEATER OF ST LOUIS$5,000
ST LOUIS SYMPHONY ORCH$5,000
UNITED WAY OF ST LOUIS$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF ST LOUIS$5,000
BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL FD$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES: $15k → 21%GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES: $4k → 21%GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES: $4k → 21%GATEWAY 180 HOMELESS SERVICES: $3k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
CA
NE
MO
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$624k · 35 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

35 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
2

Total granted

$624k
$650

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+202%

Still filing today

49%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionEducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    7× · 2017–2023 · $72k · revenue +58%
  • FO
    FOOD OUTREACH INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +3%
  • TP
    THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • JA
    JAMES A BAUER FINANCIAL AID FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $400
  • CD
    CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $250 · revenue +202%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
The Museum of Fine Arts Houston

The museum of fine arts, houston serves as a welcoming and inclusive place for all people, connecting the communities of houston with diverse histories of art spanning 6,000 years and six continents. through our permanent collections,…

Arts & Culture
7
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
8
Marymount Manhattan College

Marymount manhattan college is an urban, independent, liberal arts college (see schedule o).

Education
9
Municipal Art Society of New York

The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…

Arts & Culture
10
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
11
Smithsonian Institution

*increase and diffusion of knowledge* is the mission set forth by james smithson. the smithsonian endeavors to shape the future by preserving our heritage, discovering new knowledge, and sharing our resources with the world.

Arts & Culture
12
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha's Table Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHARLES SCHWAB DONOR ADVISORY FD: $1,135,454 · OtherCHARLES SCHWAB DONOR ADVISORY FDSCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $59,500 · Other+26 more: $372,790 · Other+26 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $72,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $14,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $3,000 · Arts & CultureFOOD OUTREACH INC: $23,000 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $13,000 · Food & NutritionHebrew Senior Life Inc: $16,100 · PhilanthropyJewish Federation of St Louis: $12,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $310 · PhilanthropyGATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $24,500 · Human ServicesCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $13,500 · Recreation & SportsRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $13,000 · Environment
Other$1,567,744Arts & Culture$89,000Food & Nutrition$36,000Philanthropy$28,410Human Services$24,500Recreation & Sports$13,500Environment$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $72,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC: $24,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFOOD OUTREACH INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $16,100 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $13,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $13,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Federation of St Louis: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $7,510 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILD BIRD FUND INC: $6,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FENN SCHOOL: $610 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc: $310 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMary Institute and St Louis Country Day School: $310 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY HOMELESS SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S TABLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of St Louis ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds WILD BIRD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FENN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mary Institute and St Louis Country Day School ↗
  • Who funds CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY12.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · AbbVie Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosenheim Family Charit Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosenheim Family Charit Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosenheim Family Charit’s filings →

More from the funding graph