· Private foundation
Rosenbaum Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k19 grants · $536k
- $50k–250k5 grants · $438k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHWEST COMMUNITY FOOD | $177,000 |
| OCEAN CONSERVANCY | $88,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA | $68,750 |
| URBAN MINISTRIES OF DURHAM | $53,500 |
| FWC | $50,000 |
| GLADD | $44,250 |
| STONEWALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $44,250 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERUCA | $44,250 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION | $44,250 |
| EDEN VILLAGE OF WILMINGTON | $39,250 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA | $29,500 |
| ARLINGTON THRIVE | $29,500 |
| HOPE AND A HOME | $29,500 |
| DIRECT RELIEF | $29,500 |
| FRIENDS OF GUEST HOUSE | $29,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $473k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER2× · 2022–2023 · $195k · revenue +11%
- SBSASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC3× · 2021–2023 · $141k · revenue +36%
- PAPEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRY2× · 2021–2022 · $131k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- BGBEAUTIFUL GATE CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $123k · revenue +197% · 33% of their budget
- MPMAXINE PLATZER LYNN WOMEN'S CENTER AT THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAone grant, 2023 · $82k
- HRHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INCone grant, 2023 · $82k · revenue +0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…
Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Facilitating statewide collaboration among Virginia's food banks, partners, and neighbors to improve nutrition security and empower strong, healthy communities.
We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…
Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arlington Thrive and the most unlike its peers is Vin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN'S CANCER ↗
- Who funds SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE AND CONGREGATIONS ENGAGED IN MINISTRY ↗
- Who funds BEAUTIFUL GATE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN INC ↗
- Who funds Eden Village of Wilmington ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Ministries of Durham Inc ↗
- Who funds STONEWALL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BREAD FOR THE CITY INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds HOPE AND A HOME ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE GUEST HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON THRIVE ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE ORATORIO SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds FARMER FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds Canines for Service Inc ↗
- Who funds VIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosenbaum Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rosenbaum Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Rosenbaum Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.