Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rosen James C T

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$76k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$347kFood & Nutrition$51kCivil Rights$32kInternational$32kCommunity Improvement$25kPhilanthropy$21kHealth$19kArts & Culture$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
$4,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE BETH EL$75,750
INTERFAITH MINISTRIES CALHOUN CNTY AL$5,000
FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARY OF$5,000
ALL SAINTS INTERFAITH CENTER$4,250
COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC$4,000
ST MICHAELS MEDICAL CLINIC$4,000
ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIENDS OF YASHAR LACHAYAL INC: $9k → 8%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS: $5k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC: $4k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS: $4k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC: $4k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS: $4k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS: $4k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NJ
RI
VA
MD
MS
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$532k · 20 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$532k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
0%

Still filing today

50%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureInternationalHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $24k · revenue +86%
  • IM
    INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC OF CALHOUN COUNTY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +11%
  • SM
    ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -48%
  • JA
    JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Council for World Jewry Inc

Founded so jews, worldwide, can join together in partnership, ensuring our common good and coolective survival. the council acts in the belief that the key to successfully countering threats against the jewish people and the state if…

Civil Rights
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
4
Institute of Human Relations of the American Jewish Committee

To reduce and eliminate group prejudice and group discrimination and to encourage healthy intergroup, inter-racial, inter-religious and other human relationships.

International
5
American Friends of Latet Humanitarian Aid Inc

None

International
6
The Israel Advocacy Group

The mission of the israel advocacy group is to provide humanitarian relief, combat antisemitism and educate the public about israel and jewish people through grantmaking, educational activities, communication and collaboration with other…

International
7
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
8
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
9
American Friends of the Heschel Center Inc

The american friends of the heschel center, inc., envisions a just and sustainable society in israel, with full participation of all its diverse inhabitants and in productive dialogue with american individuals and organizations engaged in…

International
10
American Friends of the Jerusalem Great Synagogue Inc

To provide for the needs of the great synagogue in jerusalem israel.

Religion
11
Sherit Isroel
—
12
The Abraham Initiatives Inc

Founded in 1989 and named for the common ancestor of jews and arabs, the abraham initiatives is a not-for-profit, non-partisan, organization dedicated to advancing coexistence and equality among israel's jewish and arab citizens, by…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Agency for Israel - North American Council; the most unlike its peers is St Michael's Medical Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TEMPLE BETH EL FOUNDATION: $170,000 · OtherTEMPLE BETH EL FOUNDATIONCONGREGATION OF THE SONS OF ISRAEL AND DAVID DBA TEMPLE BETH-EL: $113,750 · OtherCONGREGATION OF THE SONS OF ISRAEL AND DAVID DBA TEMPLE BETH-ELAMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMI: $23,700 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMIUNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM: $22,800 · OtherINTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $22,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC: $16,000 · Other+13 more: $74,250 · Other+13 moreCOMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC: $24,500 · Human ServicesFriends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc: $8,600 · Human ServicesHIAS INC: $23,700 · InternationalJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $8,600 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $23,700 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,700 · Civil RightsBIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $19,600 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $8,600 · PhilanthropyANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC: $19,000 · Food & NutritionST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $18,000 · Health+1 more: $500 · Health
Other$442,500Human Services$33,100International$32,300Civil Rights$29,400Philanthropy$28,200Food & Nutrition$19,000Health$18,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC: $24,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $23,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $23,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $22,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetBIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $19,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC: $19,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $18,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetFriends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc: $8,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL: $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $8,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $5,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER: $2,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE: $1,800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC OF CALHOUN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ALABAMA HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosen James C T funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosen James C T. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosen James C T’s filings →

More from the funding graph