· Private foundation
Rosen James C T
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEMPLE BETH EL | $75,750 |
| FRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC LIBRARY OF | $5,000 |
| INTERFAITH MINISTRIES CALHOUN CNTY AL | $5,000 |
| ALL SAINTS INTERFAITH CENTER | $4,250 |
| COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC | $4,000 |
| ST MICHAELS MEDICAL CLINIC | $4,000 |
| ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE2× · 2022–2023 · $24k · revenue +86%- IMINTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC OF CALHOUN COUNTY5× · 2020–2024 · $22k · revenue +11%
- SMST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC5× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +179%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INCone grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
- FOFriends of Yashar L'Chayal Incone grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue -48%
- JAJEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCILone grant, 2024 · $9k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded so jews, worldwide, can join together in partnership, ensuring our common good and coolective survival. the council acts in the belief that the key to successfully countering threats against the jewish people and the state if…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To reduce and eliminate group prejudice and group discrimination and to encourage healthy intergroup, inter-racial, inter-religious and other human relationships.
None
The mission of the israel advocacy group is to provide humanitarian relief, combat antisemitism and educate the public about israel and jewish people through grantmaking, educational activities, communication and collaboration with other…
To further jewish education in israel
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
The american friends of the heschel center, inc., envisions a just and sustainable society in israel, with full participation of all its diverse inhabitants and in productive dialogue with american individuals and organizations engaged in…
To provide for the needs of the great synagogue in jerusalem israel.
Founded in 1989 and named for the common ancestor of jews and arabs, the abraham initiatives is a not-for-profit, non-partisan, organization dedicated to advancing coexistence and equality among israel's jewish and arab citizens, by…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Agency for Israel - North American Council and the most unlike its peers is St Michael's Medical Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH MINISTRIES INC OF CALHOUN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BIRMINGHAM JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC ↗
- Who funds ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Yashar L'Chayal Inc ↗
- Who funds JEWISH AGENCY FOR ISRAEL - NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALABAMA HOLOCAUST EDUCATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OF SOUTHERN JEWISH LIFE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · The Community Foundation of Greater Birmingham · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosen James C T funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.