Skip to content
Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1 at a glance

· Private foundation

Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Philanthropy$180kHuman Services$180kEducation$128kReligion$107kArts & Culture$95kHealth$43kFood & Nutrition$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $83k
$12,747
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,934
OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION$15,934
FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE$12,747
PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$12,747
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$12,747
MIAMI COUNTY YMCA$12,747
PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$6,374
CLEAR CREEK FARM$6,374
REHAB CTR FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEV$6,374
LEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$6,374
THE SALVATION ARMY$6,374
UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY INC$6,374
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $19k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $16k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $16k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $16k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $14k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $14k → 5%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $15k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $13k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $13k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $13k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $11k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $11k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$753k · 14 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$753k
$17k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +46%
  • PL
    PIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND
    7× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +26%
  • MC
    Miami County YMCA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • PA
    PIQUA AREA UNITED FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Piqua Area Chamber of Commerce

To work with business to improve and enhance the city of piqua

—
2
Piqua Area United Way

To be a positive force in stimulating the interest, support and participation of the piqua area in the funding of the worthy educational, character building, health and welfare organizations, whether local, regional, national or…

—
3
Piqua Arts Council Inc

The organization is dedicated to making the arts accessible to our community through education, support, and presentation.

Arts & Culture
4
Muskingum Recreation Center

Dedicated to providing residents and visitors a safe, clean, and well maintained facility that promotes health, education, and recreation through a network of quality programs, activities, and amenities.

Recreation & Sports
5
Grow Piqua Now

Economic development for the city of piqua, ohio.

Community Improvement
6
Pequot Library Association

Pequot library's mission is to bring culture to life, including literature, art, science and the humanities. the library serves a broad and diverse audience and throughout the year offers a circulating collection of books and media,…

Education
7
Pikeville Area Family Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healty spirit, mind, andbody for all.

Human Services
8
Ohio Living Quaker Heights

To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.

—
9
Tuscarawas County Committee On Aging

To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs

Human Services
10
Miami County Ymca Support Corporation

Miami county ymca support corporation was formed to be a supporting organization for miami county ymca, an ohio non-profit corporation.

Human Services
11
Portage Development Board

To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.

Public Benefit
12
Bluffton-Richland Library Foundation

To solicit, collect, receive, acquire and maintain a fund or funds and to apply the income and unrestricted principal thereof to aid and assist the Bluffton Public Library, a public agency under the laws of the State of Ohio.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Piqua Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Piqua Library Assistance and Development Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $106,877 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND: $85,503 · OtherPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDYWCA PIQUA OHIO: $52,116 · OtherYWCA PIQUA OHIOCLEAR CREEK FARM: $42,751 · OtherCLEAR CREEK FARMTHE SALVATION ARMY: $42,751 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO: $37,999 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIOIndividual grant recipient: $33,387 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $29,907 · OtherLEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATIONREHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT: $23,272 · OtherREHAB CTR FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEV: $19,479 · Other+3 more: $29,476 · Other+3 moreOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $94,997 · Human ServicesOHIO LIVING FOUNDATIONMiami County YMCA: $85,503 · Human ServicesMiami County YMCAPIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $85,503 · EducationPIQUA EDUCA…PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,751 · Philanthropy
Other$503,518Human Services$180,500Education$85,503Philanthropy$42,751

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $94,997 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND: $85,503 over 7y, 18% of budgetMiami County YMCA: $85,503 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $85,503 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetYWCA PIQUA OHIO: $52,116 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetPIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,751 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCLEAR CREEK FARM: $42,751 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO: $37,999 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetREHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT: $23,272 over 4y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
  • Who funds PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YWCA PIQUA OHIO ↗
  • Who funds PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEAR CREEK FARM ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO ↗
  • Who funds REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rosemary Ovenden Char…The Troy FoundationMary E Becker Charita…The Dayton FoundationThe Niels a Lundgard …Niels a Lundgard & Ru…The Blackbaud Giving …Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2OH26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2 · The Troy Foundation · Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw · The Dayton Foundation · The Niels a Lundgard and Ruth Lundgard · Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home