Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2023
12
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$339k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Philanthropy$710kHuman Services$493kEducation$482kReligion$402kArts & Culture$321kHealth$161kFood & Nutrition$161kOther$0
02FY2023 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k6 grants · $813k
  • $250k+6 grants · $1.8M
$271,051
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION$338,815
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$338,815
FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE$271,051
MIAMI COUNTY YMCA$271,051
PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$271,051
Individual grant recipient$271,051
REHABILITATION CENTER FOR$135,526
UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY INC$135,526
PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$135,526
CLEAR CREEK FARM$135,526
THE SALVATION ARMY$135,526
LEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$135,526
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $699k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $339k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $18k → 5%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $271k → 10%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $17k → 5%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $15k → 5%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $14k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $13k → 10%MIAMI COUNTY YMCA: $12k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.8M · 12 repeat orgs$47k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$2.8M
$47k

Still filing today

58%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $389k · revenue +46%
  • PE
    PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $321k · revenue +170% · 26% of their budget
  • PL
    PIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND
    5× · 2019–2023 · $321k · revenue +26% · 85% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • MC
    MIAMI COUNTY YMCA- PIQUA OH
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2019 · $11k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Piqua Area Chamber of Commerce

To work with business to improve and enhance the city of piqua

2
Piqua Area United Way

To be a positive force in stimulating the interest, support and participation of the piqua area in the funding of the worthy educational, character building, health and welfare organizations, whether local, regional, national or…

3
Piqua Arts Council Inc

The organization is dedicated to making the arts accessible to our community through education, support, and presentation.

Arts & Culture
4
Bluffton-Richland Library Foundation

To solicit, collect, receive, acquire and maintain a fund or funds and to apply the income and unrestricted principal thereof to aid and assist the Bluffton Public Library, a public agency under the laws of the State of Ohio.

Philanthropy
5
St Boniface Reserved Education Foundation

To support Catholic education in Miami and Shelby Counties in Ohio

Education
6
Ywca Piqua Ohio

Ywca piqua, ohio is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

7
Muskingum Recreation Center

Dedicated to providing residents and visitors a safe, clean, and well maintained facility that promotes health, education, and recreation through a network of quality programs, activities, and amenities.

Recreation & Sports
8
Piqua Music Boosters Inc

To support the local high school music program

Education
9
Clear Fork Valley Foundation

To provide scholarships and educational grants to the clear fork valley community

Human Services
10
The Foundation for Pierce College

The mission of the Foundation is to develop resources and increase public awareness to support the students, educational programs and campus for the benefit of the community serviced by the college

11
Miller Deime Family Foundation

Provide scholarships and grants to any qualified ohio residents pursuing or planning to pursue and undergraduate degree at any accredited institution of higher education.

Education
12
Grow Piqua Now

Economic development for the city of piqua, ohio.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piqua Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Lehman High School Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $401,831 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND — $321,463 · OtherPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $310,849 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY — $160,735 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYCLEAR CREEK FARM — $160,735 · OtherCLEAR CREEK FARMREHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT — $160,735 · OtherREHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO — $155,428 · OtherUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIOLEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $142,632 · OtherLEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION+6 more — $57,906 · OtherOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION — $388,563 · Human ServicesOHIO LIVING FOUNDATIONMiami County YMCA — $310,849 · Human ServicesMiami County YMCAPIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $321,463 · EducationPIQUA EDUCA…PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $160,735 · Philanthropy
Other$1,872,314Human Services$699,412Education$321,463Philanthropy$160,735

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION — $388,563 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetPIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $321,463 over 5y, 26% of budgetPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND — $321,463 over 5y, 85% of budgetMiami County YMCA — $310,849 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetCLEAR CREEK FARM — $160,735 over 5y, 8.5% of budgetREHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT — $160,735 over 5y, 11% of budgetPIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $160,735 over 5y, 7.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO — $155,428 over 4y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND
  • Who funds Miami County YMCA
  • Who funds CLEAR CREEK FARM
  • Who funds REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT
  • Who funds PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO
  • Who funds Lehman High School Scholarship Fund

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1OH26.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1 · The Troy Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw · The Niels a Lundgard and Ruth Lundgard · Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph