· Private foundation
Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $287k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $33,750 |
| MIAMI COUNTY YMCA | $27,000 |
| PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FIRST PLACE FOOD PANTRY INC | $22,500 |
| CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH | $17,550 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $15,961 |
| REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL | $15,000 |
| PIQUA ARTS COUNCIL | $15,000 |
| CLEAR CREEK FARMS | $14,700 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $13,500 |
| NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC | $13,500 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $13,500 |
| SAFEHAVEN INC | $10,000 |
| HOSPICE OF MIAMI COUNTY INC | $10,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE GREATER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PEPIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2025 · $205k · revenue +170%
- MCMiami County YMCA6× · 2020–2025 · $97k · revenue +15%
- NCNEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- UVUPPER VALLEY MED CTR FDNone grant, 2020 · $57k
- CFCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH & GIRLSone grant, 2020 · $30k
- UVUpper Valley Medical Center Foundationone grant, 2019 · $29k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide for increased communication and coordination of care among social service providers in miami county; to increase funding for needed services through grants, gifts, collaborations and other resources; and to help meet the human…
Miami jewish health systems, inc. was incorporated to provide shelter for the elderly and develop social & health programs relating to their care. in addition, research & educational programs are conducted for the elderly to enhance their…
For 80 years, suncoast center, inc. has held true to its mission of "strengthening, protecting, and restoring lives for a healthy community" by providing a comprehensive range of evidence-based services that address emotional wellness,…
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
The mission of jessie trice community health system, inc. (the orgainzation) is to improve health equality for our diverse south florida community by providing and increasing access to quality comprehensive primary care services. please…
To provide mental health, substance abuse, and integrated care services to residents of ross, pike, pickaway, fayette, and highland counties in ohio.
Serves as a safety net for those summit county residents who are most in need of behavioral health services as a result of severe and persistent mental illness the agency proveides comprehensive, high quality, cost-effective treatment,…
To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…
Tri-county human services shall endeavor to provide an array of highquality human services consistent with the needs of the community.services shall be provided in a cost effective, ethical, andprofessional manner and shall focus on…
Cats strives to grow as an organization committed to our mission to deliver highly professional, state of the art chemical dependency and behavioral health services to the under-served and under-represented. cats will be known for…
To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.
Compass helps individuals and families build better lives and a stronger community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rehabilitation Center for Neurological Development and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
- Who funds NEW CREATION COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds PIQUA ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF MIAMI COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAR CREEK FARM ↗
- Who funds REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MAINSTREET PIQUA INC ↗
- Who funds MIAMI COUNTY DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds PIQUA COMPASSION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ABUSE SHELTER OF MIAMI COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds ISAIAH'S PLACE 1 ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds BETHANY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CLOTHES THAT WORK ↗
- Who funds DAYTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Troy Foundation · Piqua Community Foundation · The Niels a Lundgard and Ruth Lundgard · The Paul G Duke Foundation · The Dayton Foundation · United Way of Miami County Ohio · Upper Valley Medical Center · Synchrony Foundation · Piqua Area United Way · Hartzell Norris Charitable Trust · The Greg and Alissa Blankenship Foundation Inc · Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.