· Private foundation
Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $15,934 |
| OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION | $15,934 |
| YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION | $12,747 |
| FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE | $12,747 |
| MIAMI COUNTY YMCA | $12,747 |
| PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $12,747 |
| PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $6,374 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $6,374 |
| CLEAR CREEK FARM | $6,374 |
| REHAB CTR FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEV | $6,374 |
| LEHMAN HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $6,374 |
| UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY INC | $6,374 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $181k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OLOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +46%
- PLPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND7× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +26%
- MCMiami County YMCA7× · 2019–2025 · $86k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $12k
- PAPIQUA AREA UNITED FUNDone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To work with business to improve and enhance the city of piqua
To be a positive force in stimulating the interest, support and participation of the piqua area in the funding of the worthy educational, character building, health and welfare organizations, whether local, regional, national or…
The organization is dedicated to making the arts accessible to our community through education, support, and presentation.
Dedicated to providing residents and visitors a safe, clean, and well maintained facility that promotes health, education, and recreation through a network of quality programs, activities, and amenities.
Economic development for the city of piqua, ohio.
Pequot library's mission is to bring culture to life, including literature, art, science and the humanities. the library serves a broad and diverse audience and throughout the year offers a circulating collection of books and media,…
To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healty spirit, mind, andbody for all.
To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.
To provide opportunities to individualsover 50 years of age in tuscarawas county, ohiothrough healthy living, independence, physical andmental health, education, and recreational programs
Miami county ymca support corporation was formed to be a supporting organization for miami county ymca, an ohio non-profit corporation.
To coordinate and promote economic development on a county wide basis among all of the political subdivisions of portage county, ohio.
To solicit, collect, receive, acquire and maintain a fund or funds and to apply the income and unrestricted principal thereof to aid and assist the Bluffton Public Library, a public agency under the laws of the State of Ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Piqua Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Piqua Library Assistance and Development Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
- Who funds PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YWCA PIQUA OHIO ↗
- Who funds PIQUA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CLEAR CREEK FARM ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF MIAMI COUNTY OHIO ↗
- Who funds REHABILITATION CENTER FOR NEUROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2 · The Troy Foundation · Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw · The Dayton Foundation · The Niels a Lundgard and Ruth Lundgard · Niels a Lundgard & Ruth Lundgard Fdn · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.