How much did MARY E BECKER CHARITABLE TR UW grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of MARY E BECKER CHARITABLE TR UW’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$4,530

Median grant

States reached

$1.1M

Total assets

Largest grants

GREENE ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$9,060
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC$4,530
UVMC FOUNDATION$4,530
OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION$4,530
FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND$4,530
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$4,530
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION$4,530
PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$2,265
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$2,265
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,265
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,265

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$218k · 21 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$218k

$14k

Still filing today

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PE
PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
6× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +93%
FP
FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND
2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +40%
UF
UVMC FOUNDATION
2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +96%

Funded once

OP
OHIO PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT-LIVING
one grant, 2020 · $4k
YO
YWCA OF PIQUA OHIO
one grant, 2019 · $3k
OP
OHIO PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT
one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

OhioHealth Corporation

Our mission is to improve the health of those we serve.

Health

The University of Akron Foundation

To manage property, investments and certain expenditures for the benefit of the university of akron.

Education

Ohio State University Foundation

The Ohio State University Foundation is The Ohio State University's primary fundraising and gift-receiving organization. Its purpose is to advance the mission of Ohio State by pursuing and securing private support to benefit Ohio State…

Education

Ohio Living Communities

To provide older adults with caring and quality services toward the enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well being consistent with the christian gospel.

Human Services

The University of Cincinnati Foundation

To inspire a community of uc and uc health supporters through the power of philanthropy.

Philanthropy

Tiffin University

Educate students by linking knowledge to professional practice.

Education

Uc Healthcare System

Uc healthcare system is the sole member of uc health, llc and is responsible for facilitating interaction, cooperation and communication between the various entities that make up the uc health system to ensure a superior academic medical…

Health

Atrium Medical Center Foundation

Health

Kettering Medical Center

To improve the quality of life of the people in the communities we serve through healthcare

Health

Cleveland Museum of Art

To provide a collection of artwork representing achievement of individuals and civilizations, past and present, for the benefit of the public.

Arts & Culture

Pickaway Health Services

To attract and retain qualified healthcare professionals to meet the expanding healthcare need of pickaway county in a manner that is compassionate, exceeds patient service expectations, and results in a financially self-sustaining…

—

Wqed Multimedia

Wqed multimedia (wqed) champions communities across southwest pennsylvania by telling stories and creating experiences that educate, entertain and inspire our neighbors.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Upper Valley Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Ohio Living Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

8/8

Grantees still filing

5/8

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$162,334Health$35,394Human Services$15,580Education$11,234Philanthropy$7,380

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation MARY E BECKER CHARITABLE TR UW funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~12 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 311049748 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 12 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 4% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw?

Find your warmest path to Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

MARY E BECKER CHARITABLE TR UW

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw?

More from the funding graph

MARY E BECKER CHARITABLE TR UW

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw?

More from the funding graph