· Private foundation
Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREENE ST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $10,100 |
| UVMC FOUNDATION | $5,050 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC | $5,050 |
| YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION | $5,050 |
| ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC | $5,050 |
| OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION | $5,050 |
| FLESH PUBLIC LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND | $5,050 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $2,525 |
| PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $2,525 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $2,525 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $2,525 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PLPIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND7× · 2019–2025 · $28k · revenue +26%
- OLOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION5× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +38%
- YPYWCA PIQUA OHIO4× · 2019–2025 · $16k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- OPOHIO PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT-LIVINGone grant, 2020 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2022 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.
We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.
Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.
The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…
To improve practice and patient care by providing affordable quality urological education.
The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…
We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.
We care. we teach. we innovate. we serve.
Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.
Riverside medical center is committed to improving the well-being of the communities it serves, regardless of an individual's ability to pay. in addition to the day-to-day services provided to patients, riverside medical center reaches…
The american college of health care administrators (achca) is the catalyst for excellence in post-acute and aging services leadership.
To ensure the professional growth, personal excellence, and recognition of physician associates, and to support efforts to enable them to improve the quality, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness of patient-centered health care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca Piqua Ohio and the most unlike its peers is Piqua Library Assistance and Development Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PIQUA LIBRARY ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YWCA PIQUA OHIO ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds PIQUA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UVMC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Miami County YMCA ↗
- Who funds UPPER VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #1 · Rosemary Ovenden Char Tr #2 · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mary E Becker Charitable Tr Uw funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.