Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roop Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$747k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$548kHuman Services$325kYouth Development$254kReligion$161kHealth$109kRecreation & Sports$16kArts & Culture$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $1,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $746,614 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $745,614 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NPO Hope Farm Inc$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOPE FARM INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 16 repeat orgs$225k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +60% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$1.3M
$224k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+60%

Still filing today

81%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’25
Youth DevelopmentEducationHealthMembership BenefitInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $300k · revenue +78%
  • TA
    TEXAS ACADEMY 4
    3× · 2020–2022 · $119k · revenue +210%
  • RA
    RIVERTREE ACADEMY
    3× · 2020–2022 · $114k · revenue +133%

Funded once

  • KU
    KY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH CHILDREN'S HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $70k
  • CC
    CORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $26k
  • SH
    SHOW HOPE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $21k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
2
Oconee Christian Academy

Oconee Christian Academy exists to glorify God by nurturing students and equipping them to fulfill God's unique purpose for their lives.

Education
3
Youth for Christ Inc Fayetteville Area

Yfc reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other likeminded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to the word of god and prayer, passion for…

Youth Development
4
Pinnacle Christian School

Pinnacle Christian School serves to meet the education needs of families in the greater Parker County area by providing complete, advanced, Bible-based academic K-8th grade instruction taught by highly-qualified teachers on Tuesdays and…

Education
5
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
6
Foundation Preparatory Academy

Provide a college-preparatory education in a christian environment through a university-model-school - a blend of traditional public and private schools and home schools. currently kindergarten - 12th grade.

Education
7
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
8
Kings Academy Nashville

King's academy is a pre-k-8th grade independent christian school in nashville, tennessee, providing a classically inspired education to a racially and socioeconomically balanced student body.

Education
9
Truth Academy Inc

Truth academy works in partnership with families to integrate high-quality education with biblical truth and discipleship in order to train students, spiritually and academically, how to operate in their god-given purpose and live out a…

Religion
10
Fort Bend Christian Academy

Fort Bend Christian Academy exists to glorify God through excellence in college preparatory Christian education. FBCA strives to equip students with the ability to thrive spiritually, academically, socially, and physically.

Education
11
Crossroads Christian Academy Attn Lee Guetterman

Crossroads Christian Academy partners with parents to provide a Christ-Centered, college preparatory education where students are allowed to further develop their God-given talents and virtues and become college-worthy character witnesses…

Education
12
Providence Christian Academy

In dependence upon Almighty God, for His glory alone, and together with family and church, the mission of Providence Christian Academy is to provide exemplary education for the vulnerable in the light of God's Word for time and eternity.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Our Father's Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alice Lloyd College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KY UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $140,000 · OtherKY UNITED METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOMEChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $95,000 · OtherChrist's Haven for Children IncKY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH CHILDREN'S HOME: $70,000 · OtherKY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH CHILDREN'S HOMETHE HILLS CHURCH OF CHRIST: $70,000 · OtherTHE HILLS CHURCH OF CHRISTCORNERSTONE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $25,808 · OtherFort Worth Teen Challenge Inc: $25,000 · OtherSHOW HOPE FOUNDATION: $20,550 · OtherPREGANCY HELP 4 U: $20,000 · Other+13 more: $114,650 · Other+13 moreALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $300,000 · EducationALICE LLOYD COLLEGEFELLOWSHIP ACADEMY: $15,000 · EducationRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $113,800 · Youth DevelopmentRIVERTREE ACADEMYTEEN LIFELINE INC: $113,254 · Youth DevelopmentTEEN LIFELINE INCFORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $67,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOP…+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $119,000 · Membership BenefitALLIES IN YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $81,000 · InternationalPREGNANCY HELP 4U INC: $38,700 · HealthAPPALACHIAN PREGNANCY CARE CENTERS INC: $30,000 · HealthOUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC: $45,000 · Religion
Other$581,008Education$315,000Youth Development$295,054Membership Benefit$119,000International$81,000Health$68,700Religion$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $300,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTEXAS ACADEMY 4: $119,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetRIVERTREE ACADEMY: $113,800 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetTEEN LIFELINE INC: $113,254 over 3y, 9.6% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $95,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetALLIES IN YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $81,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetFORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $67,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetOUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC: $45,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetPREGNANCY HELP 4U INC: $38,700 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN PREGNANCY CARE CENTERS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetFort Worth Teen Challenge Inc: $25,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP ACADEMY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CONVERSATION GROUP: $15,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC: $9,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHAMPION MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF PIKEVILLE EXPOSITION CENTER CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ACADEMY 4 ↗
  • Who funds RIVERTREE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TEEN LIFELINE INC ↗
  • Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALLIES IN YOUTH DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds FORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR FATHER'S CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY HELP 4U INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN PREGNANCY CARE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Fort Worth Teen Challenge Inc ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE CONVERSATION GROUP ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAMPION MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CITY OF PIKEVILLE EXPOSITION CENTER CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of North Texas (TaxTX25× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Amon G Carter Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Imogene C & Daniel E Jansen Charitable Trust · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Doug and Jayne Orr Family Foundation · Katrine Menzing Deakins Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roop Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roop Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roop Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph