Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ronald S Lushing Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$225kInternational$61kHealth$42kReligion$39kCivil Rights$18kEducation$12kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$616k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC$6,600
LEO BAECK TEMPLE$5,760
PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC$5,000
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH$5,000
SANTA FE OPERA$5,000
CONCERN FOUNDATION$4,000
MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION$2,500
CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS$2,500
CARAVANSERAI PROJECT$2,500
LOS ANGELES CONSERVANCY$2,500
PBS$2,500
SWAIA$2,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER$2,000
LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS$1,000
BIENVENIDOS OUTREACH$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VISTA DEL MAR: $5k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 14%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$398k · 30 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
13

Total granted

$398k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
0%

Still filing today

57%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
    8× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +32%
  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $57k · revenue +53%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    7× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • K
    KCET
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • PS
    PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue 0%
  • SF
    SLB FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -90%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Barbara Museum of Art

To integrate art into the lives of people, fostering imagination, stimulating thought, and creating personally rewarding experiences.

Arts & Culture
2
Opera Santa Barbara

See schedule 0founded in 1994, opera santa barbara is the signature provider of professional opera on the california central coast. we aspire to be a cultural leader in the santa barbara region, voicing and advancing our community's spirit…

Arts & Culture
3
Asian Art Museum Foundation of San Francisco

The asian art museum celebrates, preserves, and promotes asian and asian american art and cultures for local and global audiences. we provide a dynamic forum for exchanging ideas, inviting collaboration, and fueling imagination to deepen…

Arts & Culture
4
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
5
San Diego Opera Association

Mission: the mission of san diego opera is to deliver exceptional performances and exciting, accessible programs to diverse audiences, focusing on community partnerships, and the transformative and expressive power of the human voice. as…

Arts & Culture
6
Laguna Art Museum

The museum's primary exempt purpose is to promote the understanding of the role of art and artists in americn culture through collect, exhibition, research, and instruction. the focus of the organization collection is on the art of…

Arts & Culture
7
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
8
Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego

The museum of contemporary art san diego invites all audiences to experience our world, our region, and ourselves through the prism of contemporary art.

Arts & Culture
9
Santa Paula Art Museum

The organization's mission is to preserve and share santa paula's artistic heritage, including the famous santa paula collection; and to educate and engage the community through collection, exhibition, interpretation, programming, and…

Arts & Culture
10
California Institute of Contemporary Art
11
Armand Hammer Museum of Art and Cultural Center Inc

The hammer museum at ucla believes in the promise of art and ideas to illuminate our lives and build a more just world.

Arts & Culture
12
Santa Fe Conservation Trust

The santa fe conservation trust partners with our community to keep northern new mexico's living lands and people flourishing together. we protect culturally and environmentally significant landscapes, ignite people's passion for nature…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Santa Fe Opera and the most unlike its peers is Slb Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPerforming Arts Organizatio…Community Health CentersEarly Childhood & Family Se…Public Interest Advocacy & …University & College Founda…Family Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%5%<5yr16%15%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%10%20–35yr10%25%35–55yr12%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%2%<5yr16%2%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%4%20–35yr10%47%35–55yr12%31%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/28
the rest of the field
16%
9,441/58,923

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $89,810 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTDTHE SANTA FE OPERA — $32,865 · Arts & CultureTHE SANTA FE OPERAMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $16,065 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATIONSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $11,250 · Arts & CultureSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INCSITE SANTA FE — $6,800 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC — $6,500 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $16,348 · Arts & Culture+4 moreLEO BAECK TEMPLE — $38,600 · OtherLEO BAECK TEMPLEFEMINIST MAJORITY — $15,375 · OtherFEMINIST MAJORITYKCET — $15,000 · OtherKCETMUSIC CENTER — $14,070 · OtherMUSIC CENTERCANCER FOUNDATION OF MEXICO — $12,700 · OtherCANCER FOUNDATION OF MEXICOIndividual grant recipient — $12,415 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRANSPLANTATION — $6,500 · OtherSWAIA — $6,315 · OtherPBS — $6,000 · OtherBIENVENIDOS OUTREACH INC — $5,750 · OtherLENSIC PERFORMING ARTS — $5,518 · Other+13 more — $13,500 · Other+13 moreHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $57,100 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WA…CARAVANSERAI PROJECT — $3,500 · InternationalCARAVANSERAI PR…CONCERN FOUNDATION — $14,500 · PhilanthropyGAMMA MU FOUNDATION INC — $2,900 · PhilanthropySANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $500 · PhilanthropyUCLA FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,000 · EducationVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $7,000 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER — $4,000 · Human ServicesSLB FOUNDATION — $2,300 · Recreation & SportsBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC — $500 · Health
Arts & Culture$179,638Other$151,743International$60,600Philanthropy$18,900Education$11,000Human Services$11,000Recreation & Sports$2,300Health$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD — $89,810 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $57,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA — $32,865 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION — $16,065 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY — $15,375 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION — $14,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $11,250 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSITE SANTA FE — $6,800 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIENVENIDOS OUTREACH INC — $5,750 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES CONSERVANCY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS OF SANTA FE INC — $4,873 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM — $3,975 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCARAVANSERAI PROJECT — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGAMMA MU FOUNDATION INC — $2,900 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLB FOUNDATION — $2,300 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWomen Against Gun Violence — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBarak Ballet Corporation — $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetI'm Not Done Yet Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIN A LANDSCAPE — $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL LTD
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
  • Who funds THE SANTA FE OPERA
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FEMINIST MAJORITY
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SANTA FE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES
  • Who funds SITE SANTA FE
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS FRIENDS OF PHILHARMONIC
  • Who funds BIENVENIDOS OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR CONTEMPORARY ARTS OF SANTA FE INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNSELING CENTER
  • Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM
  • Who funds CARAVANSERAI PROJECT
  • Who funds GAMMA MU FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM
  • Who funds SLB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Women Against Gun Violence
  • Who funds Barak Ballet Corporation
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BUMBLEBEE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds I'm Not Done Yet Foundation Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greenberg FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greenberg Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Gale Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Carl & Marilynn Thoma Foundation · New Mexico Humanities Council · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ronald S Lushing Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • In a Landscape0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph