Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ronald J Woods Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$366k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$3.1MHuman Services$2.6MHealth$1.6MEducation$970kRecreation & Sports$516kArts & Culture$294kCrime & Legal$222kPublic Safety & Disaster$159kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $561k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $350k
  • $250k+1 grant · $366k
$15,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAVE THE CHIMPS$365,750
LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND$200,000
US OLYMPIC & PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION$100,000
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$50,000
CHRIST CHILD HOUSE$46,400
CROSSOVER MISSION$46,000
THERAPEUTIC RIDING INCORPORATED$45,000
INDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE$40,500
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$38,000
MADONNA UNIVERISTY$35,000
ST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL$31,000
GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND$30,000
CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA WESTERN FOUNDATION$23,500
MONTANA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY$21,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 9%YMCA OF THE SUNCOAST INC: $3k → 12%BIG CAT RESCUE: $15k → 13%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $343k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $25k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 9%BIG CAT RESCUE: $5k → 13%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $25k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 9%OPERATION HEALING FORCES: $25k → 13%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $20k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 9%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $300k → 8%PAWS WITH A CAUSE: $20k → 10%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $30k → 9%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $295k → 8%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $10k → 9%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $200k → 8%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $20k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $180k → 8%BUILDUP STEAM INC: $8k → 8%LEADERDOGS FOR THE BLIND: $155k → 8%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $76k → 21%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $46k → 21%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $42k → 21%CHRIST CHILD HOUSE: $15k → 21%ANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
MI
NY
WY
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
TN
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Ronald J Woods Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 35% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 31%.

Ronald J Woods Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.9M · 60 repeat orgs$385k to everyone else

60 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
39

Total granted

$9.9M
$338k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+49%

Still filing today

53%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SAVE THE CHIMPS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +10%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +26%
  • DR
    Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries
    8× · 2017–2024 · $455k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • OH
    OPERATION HEALING FORCES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +53%
  • AM
    ADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE POOR INC
    one grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
4
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
5
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
6
Pasado's Safe Haven

Fighting to end animal cruelty and create a more compassionate world.(continued in schedule o)fiscal year 2024-2025 highlights include:investigated/resourced 71 animal cruelty cases, provided care andrehabilitations for 398 animals at our…

Animals
7
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
8
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
9
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
10
Dogs Playing for Life Inc

Dogs playing for life is redefining the meaning and importance of quality of life for all sheltered dogs by improving their experience through playgroups and individualized training, resulting in urgent and responsible livesaving.

Animals
11
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
12
Beagle Freedom Project

Beagle freedom project's mission is to eliminate the suffering of all animals. this goal is achieved by rescuing exploited, abused, unwanted and homeless animals and by educating the public of the vast extent of the suffering animals…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guiding Eyes for the Blind Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shagganappi Newfoundlands Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/63
Grantees still filing
47/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $2,441,800 · AnimalsSAVE THE CHIMPS INCI HEART DOGS RESCUE AND ANIMAL HAVEN: $110,000 · Animals+9 more: $173,500 · Animals+9 moreTherapeutic Riding Inc: $315,275 · OtherTherapeutic Riding IncDE LA SALLE COLLEGIATE: $286,550 · OtherDE LA SALLE COLLEGIATETHE ABILITY EXPERIENCE: $245,000 · OtherTHE ABILITY EXPERIENCEPROJECT NEWF LLC: $158,861 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $155,104 · OtherFORT PIERCE POLICE DEPARTMENT: $140,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $136,500 · OtherST LABRE INDIAN SCHOOL: $130,780 · OtherHAVEN: $123,270 · OtherFIRST STEP: $120,000 · OtherST LUCIE CTY SHER CRIME PREVENTION FUND: $113,000 · OtherSHAGGANAPPI NEWFOUNDLANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $140,195 · OtherPORT ST LUCIE POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $129,155 · Other+53 more: $946,000 · Other+53 moreLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2,073,120 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLINDTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $178,512 · Human ServicesTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF …GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $160,000 · Human ServicesGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND I…Paws With A Cause: $90,000 · Human Services+5 more: $85,000 · Human ServicesDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $455,000 · HealthBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $33,000 · Health+5 more: $33,500 · HealthUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $363,000 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC: $145,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsWarrior Dog Foundation: $301,200 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $56,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $7,500 · Youth DevelopmentINDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $117,000 · EducationBELGRADE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,500 · EducationMadonna University: $65,000 · EducationTHE UNIV OF MONTANA-WESTERN FOUNDATION: $28,500 · EducationEDUCATION ACCESS INC: $20,000 · Education+3 more: $19,000 · Education
Animals$2,725,300Other$3,139,690Human Services$2,586,632Health$596,500Recreation & Sports$513,000Youth Development$364,700Education$320,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAVE THE CHIMPS INC: $2,441,800 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $2,073,120 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetDetroit Rescue Mission Ministries: $455,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION: $363,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTherapeutic Riding Inc: $315,275 over 8y, 11% of budgetWarrior Dog Foundation: $301,200 over 6y, 18% of budgetTHE ABILITY EXPERIENCE: $245,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetTHE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT: $178,512 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetGUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC: $160,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC: $145,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSHAGGANAPPI NEWFOUNDLANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $140,195 over 8y, 100% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $136,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetPORT ST LUCIE POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $129,155 over 6y, 41% of budgetHAVEN: $123,270 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetINDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $117,000 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetI HEART DOGS RESCUE AND ANIMAL HAVEN: $110,000 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $90,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBELGRADE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $70,500 over 5y, 39% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL: $70,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetMadonna University: $65,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSOVER MISSION INC: $56,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER INC: $55,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX MULTISPORT INC: $33,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE UNIV OF MONTANA-WESTERN FOUNDATION: $28,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBUILDUP STEAM INC: $27,500 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetOPERATION HEALING FORCES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetADORER MISSIONARY SISTERS OF THE POOR INC: $23,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBRIDGING INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITIES: $23,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGRIZZLY DISCOVERY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEDUCATION ACCESS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetA SAFE HAVEN FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRANCISCAN OUTREACH: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWe Fund the Blue Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetANGELA HOSPICE HOME CARE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LENNON CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCoastal Wildlife Club Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBelmont University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAFFORD ANIMAL SHELTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAVE THE CHIMPS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds Detroit Rescue Mission Ministries ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES OLYMPIC AND PARALYMPIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Therapeutic Riding Inc ↗
  • Who funds Warrior Dog Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE ABILITY EXPERIENCE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL SPORTS CENTER FOR THE DISABLED INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAGGANAPPI NEWFOUNDLANDS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds PORT ST LUCIE POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds INDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds I HEART DOGS RESCUE AND ANIMAL HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds Paws With A Cause ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BELGRADE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOLF HAVEN INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Madonna University ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOLPHIN RESEARCH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Catholic Foundation of MichiganMI13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Catholic Foundation of Michigan · Assurant Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Aetna Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ronald J Woods Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ronald J Woods Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Dolphin Research Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ronald J Woods Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Ronald J Woods Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 109 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ronald J Woods’ filings →

More from the funding graph