Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ron and Jan Weishaar Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Religion$56kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$7kHealth$3kEducation$3kYouth Development$2kArts & Culture$1kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST ANTHONY'S CHURCH$38,000
SISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGE$6,000
MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES$4,000
FRANSISCAN SISTERS OF CHRIST$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
FOOD FOR THE POOR$2,000
GREAT PLAINS CASA FOR KIDS$2,000
HEREFORD FOOD PANTRY INC$2,000
CHRISTMAS STOCKING FUND$2,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$2,000
PINE CASTLE$1,500
BISHOP DEFALCO RETREAT CENTER$1,040
ST ANTHONY'S SCHOOL ENDOWMENT FUND$1,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
EVALINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMARILLO CHILDREN'S HOME: $300 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
IN
VA
MD
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 7 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$27k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+37%

Still filing today

57%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $57k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesPhilanthropyReligionArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k
  • FS
    FRANSISCAN SISTERS OF CHRIST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k
  • FOOD FOR THE POOR INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue -16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • EH
    EVERYDAY HEROES FUND DRIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
2
Presbyterian Children's Home of the Highlands Inc

Providing, maintaining and operating a home (including a temporary shelter) for the purpose of protecting, training and educating dependent children.

Human Services
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Hope Institute

Transform the lives of high-risk orphans and vulnerable children by improving quality of care at orphanages worldwide through the sharing and replication of experience-garnered, research-proven protocols and methodologies.

Philanthropy
5
Joy Ranch Inc

To provide housing and services to children who are unable to live with their parents or guardians.

Human Services
6
Chosen Vision Inc

To enable developmentally disabled adults to live in a safe, secure christian environment

Religion
7
Sonshine Ministries International

We provide homes, a healthy diet, medical treatment, quality education, and counseling for orphaned abused and neglected children in Tanzania, East Africa. Sonshine works directly with Child Welfare Services of Tanzania. CWS provides…

—
8
Hendrick Home for Children
—
9
Hope House Day Care Center Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide supportive social services to children and individuals affected by hiv and poverty in order to enhance the quality of their lives. the mission is to improve the quality of life for individuals…

Human Services
10
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

—
11
Albuquerque Christian Children's Home Inc

The home provides care for children and wards of the court placed for foster home purposes.

Human Services
12
Samaritan House Inc

Provide shelter and basic needs for homeless people. while fostering self-respect and human dignity, samaritan house will encourage the residents' efforts to find employment and housing.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST ANTHONYS CHURCH: $38,000 · OtherST ANTHONYS CHURCHSISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGE: $12,000 · OtherSISTERS OF MARY WORLD VILLAGEIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherFRANSISCAN SISTERS OF CHRIST: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherST ANTHONY'S SCHOOL ENDOWMENT FUND: $3,000 · Other+13 more: $13,140 · Other+13 moreMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $4,000 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $3,000 · InternationalGREAT PLAINS CASA FOR KIDS INC: $3,000 · Crime & LegalHEREFORD FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · PhilanthropyEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $1,000 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $300 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 · ReligionAMARILLO ART INSTITUTE INC: $750 · Arts & CultureHOPE CHOICE INC: $500 · Health
Other$77,140International$7,000Crime & Legal$3,000Philanthropy$2,000Human Services$1,300Religion$1,000Arts & Culture$750Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT PLAINS CASA FOR KIDS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHEREFORD FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPINE CASTLE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMARILLO ART INSTITUTE INC: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE CHOICE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT PLAINS CASA FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEREFORD FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds PINE CASTLE INC ↗
  • Who funds EVELINE'S SUNSHINE COTTAGE ↗
  • Who funds HETLINGER DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES I ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds AMARILLO ART INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE CHOICE INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary E Bivins FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary E Bivins Foundation · Amarillo Area Foundation Inc · Mays Foundation · Dr Kent Roberts & Ilene Roberts Balliett Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ron and Jan Weishaar Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ron and Jan Weishaar Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pine Castle Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ron and Jan Weishaar’s filings →

More from the funding graph