Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rohlen Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$18k
Granted FY2023
20
Grants FY2023
8
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Food & Nutrition$38kHealth$21kEducation$16kArts & Culture$8kReligion$8kHousing & Shelter$7kHuman Services$6kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF LOL LIBRARY$1,000
NORTHERN WATERS MUSEUM$1,000
ASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK$1,000
LOLA$1,000
KICK CANCER$1,000
ART INSTITUTE$1,000
COMM FOR TEMP SHELTER$1,000
CERF$1,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK$1,000
OCONOMOWOC FOOD BANK$1,000
SISKIYOU COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$850
SISKIYOU LAND TRUST$750
COMMUNITY FUNDATION OF THE NORTH ST$750
WATERSMEET FOOD PANTRY$750
MASLOW PROJECT$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KICK CANCER: $6k → 10%KICK CANCER: $5k → 10%KICK CANCER: $5k → 10%KICK CANCER: $1k → 10%KICK CANCER: $1k → 10%SISKIYOU FOOD ASSISTANCE: $2k → 16%SISKIYOU FOOD ASSISTANCE: $750 → 16%SISKIYOU FOOD ASSISTANCE: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
WI
MI
MA
OR
WY
CA
MO
KY
DE
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Rohlen Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Rohlen Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$117k · 33 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +45% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2023, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
17

Total granted

$117k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+45%

Still filing today

39%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KICKcancER Movement
    5× · 2018–2023 · $18k · revenue +8%
  • AE
    ASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +260%
  • BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • SM
    SHASTA MOUNTAIN LEARNING CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    CISCO CHAIN RIPARIAN OWNERS AS
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ashland Food Project

Ashland Food Project and Talent Food Project conduct bimonthly food drives in their respective towns, to keep their local food bank/pantry consistently stocked throughout the year. This is an all-volunteer operation, utilizing an organized…

Food & Nutrition
2
Hunger Free Vermont Inc

To end the injustice of hunger for everyone and prioritize the people most affected by hunger to make a permanent systemic change.

Crime & Legal
3
Lake County Food Share Inc

Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.

Food & Nutrition
4
Arkansas Foodbank

None

Food & Nutrition
5
Wisconsin Woodland Owners Association Incorporated

The mission of the wisconsin woodland owners association is to conserve and enhance the private woodlands of the state through the following actions: sustainably manage our woodlands with informed management plans that utilize best…

Environment
6
Fondy Food Center Inc

He fondy food center connects greater milwaukee to local, fresh food- from farm to market to table - so that children learn better, adults live healthier, and communities celebrate cultural food traditions.

Food & Nutrition
7
Josephine County Food Bank

Our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger by empowering our community. we respond to the root causes of hunger and supports our community by striving to nourish, restore dignity, provide health and champion…

Human Services
8
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
9
Washington Water Trust

Wwt's mission is to protect and restore water in rivers and streams across washington state. washington water trust restores and protects water in rivers and streams and promotes sustainable freshwater management in washington, and, more…

Environment
10
Feeding Wisconsin Inc

Our vision is a hunger-free wisconsin and our mission is to help our food banks and partners fight hunger, improve health and strengthen local communities so that everybody in wisconsin has access to the food and benefits they need to…

Food & Nutrition
11
Second Harvest Foodbank of Southern Wi

Second harvest foodbank exists to end hunger in southwestern wisconsin.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Share of Lincoln County

To alleviate hunger in lincoln county by soliciting, collecting, and distributing food through a network of agencies. to provide temporary services to individuals and families in time of need. to assist clients to become more…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vermont Foodbank; the most unlike its peers is Leigh Yawkey Woodson Art Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOLA: $7,200 · OtherLOLAIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMT SHASTA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,750 · OtherMT SHASTA EDUCATION FOUNDATIONOCONOMOWOC FOOD BANK: $5,500 · OtherOCONOMOWOC FOOD BANKACCESS: $5,500 · OtherACCESSCOMM FOR TEMP SHELTER: $5,000 · OtherCOMM FOR TEMP SHELTERTHE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $3,850 · OtherANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD: $3,400 · OtherNOLS: $3,250 · OtherELY CHURCH: $3,100 · OtherFRIENDS OF LOL LIBRARY: $3,000 · OtherSHASTA MOUNTAIN LEARNING CENTER: $3,000 · OtherNORTHERN WATERS MUSEUM: $3,000 · Other+28 more: $26,300 · Other+28 moreKICKcancER Movement: $18,000 · Human ServicesKICKcancER MovementBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $6,100 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPAC…Siskiyou Food Assistance Corporation: $2,850 · Human ServicesSiskiyou Food Assistan…ASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $8,500 · Food & NutritionASHLAND EMERG…VERMONT FOODBANK: $5,750 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FOODB…Siskiyou Community Food Bank: $1,950 · Food & NutritionSiskiyou Comm…+1 more: $250 · Food & NutritionCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC: $3,500 · PhilanthropyASHLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $500 · EducationSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $2,000 · AnimalsCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $1,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$83,850Human Services$26,950Food & Nutrition$16,450Philanthropy$3,500Education$2,500Animals$2,000Housing & Shelter$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKICKcancER Movement: $18,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK: $8,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $6,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVERMONT FOODBANK: $5,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $3,850 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD: $3,400 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSiskiyou Food Assistance Corporation: $2,850 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSiskiyou Community Food Bank: $1,950 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASLOW PROJECT: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEIGH YAWKEY WOODSON ART MUSEUM INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAND O LAKES AREA ARTISANS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KICKcancER Movement ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND EMERGENCY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds THE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CRAFT EMERGENCY RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGEL ON MY SHOULDER LTD ↗
  • Who funds Siskiyou Food Assistance Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Siskiyou Community Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON TEMPORARY SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MASLOW PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rohlen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rohlen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 52%
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Committee On Temporary Shelter Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Maslow Project: 22% of income from government
  • Vermont Foodbank: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rohlen’s filings →

More from the funding graph