· Private foundation
Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $76k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $267k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER | $37,200 |
| HOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| JUMP THE MOON FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| EDGEMONT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL | $21,000 |
| RIVER SIDON PEACE WITH | $20,000 |
| MADISON HIGH SCHOOL | $13,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $11,000 |
| QUEEN CREEK HIGH SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SOLEY FOR KIDS SHOE DRIVE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| NAUVOO ARTS COUNCIL | $10,000 |
| MAPLE GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| ELKO INSTITUTE OF ACADEMIC | $10,000 |
| PLAY | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +18% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.
19 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 27 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- HMHOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +22%
- ABARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue +5%
- DVDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION INC2× · 2022–2025 · $18k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- IFIDAHO FALLS SCHOOL DIST 91one grant, 2022 · $48k
- NENEBO EDUCATION FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue -27%
- FTFlourish Therapy Incgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +111%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide traing that assists school psych
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Ronald McDonald House Mountain West surrounds families with the support they need to be near and care for their seriously ill or injured children.
To prevent teen suicide in Arizona by enhancing resiliency in youth and fostering supportive communities. Vision is that all youth possess a sense of connectedness and hope for their future. Teen Lifeline has a singular focus to prevent…
We serve Utah's children by finding, educating, and nurturing families to meet the needs of children in foster care
To help feed, educate and advocate for Idaho's hungry through collaborative partnerships to develop efficient solutions that strengthen individuals, families, and communities.
Camp hobe provides psychosocial support for children with cancer (and similar disorders) and their families.
How this is measured
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOPE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEBO EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA BRAINFOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Encircle Family and Youth Resource Center ↗
- Who funds Flourish Therapy Inc ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds JUMP THE MOON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Hope Street Group ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION INC ↗
- Who funds SPRINGS OF REDEMPTION ↗
- Who funds MADISON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F. Bigger dots raise more.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F?
Find your warmest path to Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Roger & Sybil Ferguson Charitable F’s filings →