Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roger and Priscilla Schultz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$179kHuman Services$78kHealth$69kFood & Nutrition$49kReligion$28kAnimals$11kRecreation & Sports$10kEnvironment$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$6,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN CENTER$5,000
THE GIVING PLATE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,949
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1k → 14%PARTNERS IN CARE: $3k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $3k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE: $3k → 10%RAINBOW SERVICES LTD: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
WA
MN
MI
OR
IN
OH
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$459k · 42 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
47

Total granted

$459k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+38%

Still filing today

36%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GIVING PLATE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +244%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN CARE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $8k · revenue +2%
  • PC
    PENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • PD
    PHI DELTA EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • A
    ALSHEIMERS
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • PO
    Prisoners of Hope Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue -96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
2
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
3
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
4
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
5
Wildearth Guardians

Wildearth guardians works to protect and restore the wildlife, wild places, wild rivers, and health of the american west.

Unclassified
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
8
Rogue Climate

Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…

Education
9
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
10
Great Peninsula Conservancy

Preserve in perpetuity the natural habitats, rural landscapes, and open spaces of the great peninsula of washington's puget sound.

Environment
11
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
12
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Katmai Conservancy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $171,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN CENTER: $64,380 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN CENTEROHSU MS CENTER OF NEUROLOGY: $17,000 · Other+72 more: $146,080 · Other+72 moreTHE GIVING PLATE: $52,103 · Food & NutritionTHE GIVING …LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER: $20,500 · HealthPENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $4,000 · HealthSt Charles Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital: $1,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN CARE: $7,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 · Human ServicesRAINBOW SERVICES: $1,500 · Human ServicesKatmai Conservancy: $3,000 · EnvironmentCentral Oregon Trail Alliance: $2,061 · EnvironmentSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentDeschutes Land Trust: $500 · EnvironmentUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationBEND INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC: $2,500 · EducationPrisoners of Hope Inc: $4,000 · InternationalGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · International
Other$398,460Food & Nutrition$52,103Health$27,500Human Services$11,000Environment$6,561Education$5,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GIVING PLATE: $52,103 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetLUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER: $20,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKatmai Conservancy: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEND INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Oregon Trail Alliance: $2,061 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSt Charles Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCan Do Multiple Sclerosis: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARMONY FARM SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE: $1,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRAINBOW SERVICES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH COAST BOTANIC GARDEN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROFESSIONAL PEACE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFaithful Friends: $625 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDeschutes Land Trust: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE A21 CAMPAIGN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIO Frontiers: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADES THEATRICAL COMPANY: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALOS VERDES PERFORMING ARTS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Area Youth for Christ: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
  • Who funds LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA COMMITTEE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Prisoners of Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Katmai Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds BEND INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Oregon Trail Alliance ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S RESOURCES OF OREGON ↗
  • Who funds St Charles Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Can Do Multiple Sclerosis ↗
  • Who funds HARMONY FARM SANCTUARY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR23× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Anjulicia Foundation · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Autzen Foundation · Bend Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Wm Keck Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Dziuban Foundation · Smith-Welsh Foundation · Aria Foundation Co Tg Tax & Accounting Services LLC

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roger and Priscilla Schultz Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roger and Priscilla Schultz Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Deschutes Land Trust: 46% of income from government
  • Casa-Voices for Children: 20% of income from government
  • Bend International School Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Trail Alliance: 1% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roger and Priscilla Schultz Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roger and Priscilla Schultz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roger and Priscilla Schultz Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph