How much did ROEHL FAMILY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 65% of ROEHL FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

aid

2019

—

2020

education poverty

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $25k
$10k–50k29 grants · $459k
$50k–250k2 grants · $170k

$12,000

Median grant

States reached

$17M

Total assets

Largest grants

CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL$100,000
ELWA MINISTRIES ASSOCIATION$70,000
SHARING & CARING HANDS$35,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$30,000
MINNEAPOLIS HEART INSITITUE$30,000
ICCDF - CHAT LA ROMANA SCHOOL$30,000
HAMMER RESIDENCES$25,000
NEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES$20,000
CRESCENT LOVE$20,000
RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION$20,000
HOPE ACADEMY$18,000
RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION - SCHOLARSHIP$16,000
DES MOINES CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
RAPE ABUSE & INCEST NATIONAL NETWO$15,000
ELEVATE LIFE$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $503k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$3.9M · 45 repeat orgs$202k to everyone else

45 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$3.9M

$192k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%

+107%

Still filing today

36%

30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthInternationalPhilanthropyEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SC
Sharing & Caring Hands Inc
8× · 2017–2024 · $245k · revenue +52%
RF
Ridgeview Foundation
8× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +10%
HR
Hammer Residences Inc
8× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +55%

Funded once

CR
CRISTO REY JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL
one grant, 2017 · $50k
HF
HNOJ-FIRE FOR DISCIPLESHIP
one grant, 2017 · $12k
TF
TOGETHER FOR GOODgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +385%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lifewater Inc

Lifewater International is a non-profit Christian water development organization.

Environment

Partners for Affordable Housing

Provides shelter for homeless families & individuals, & helps them to secure long-term housing.

—

Life International

To uphold the value of all human life worldwide.

Health

Every Orphans Hope

To glorify God and see orphans raised to life in Christ, in a home, in a family, and in a community where they are known and loved.

Religion

Life House

To bring life in abundance to Uganda using vocational training and spiritual renewal.

Human Services

Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill exists that homeless children and adults receive food and shelter with compassion, hear the good news of jesus christ, and move toward healthy relationships and stability.

Human Services

Christs Hope U S a Inc

Empowering orphaned and vulnerable children to break the cycles of extreme poverty, AIDS, and spiritual brokenness through family-based care and discipleship in Jesus Christ.

Human Services

Servenow

Sharing Christ's passion for the world by serving the most vulnerable through national churches and leaders.

Human Services

Advocates for Family Peace

To improve lives by ending domestic violence.

Human Services

Life Network

Life Network exists to cultivate a community that values life through the love of Christ.

Health

Life Line of Hope a Non-Profit

Lifeline of Hope provides daily care to orphans through management and support of children's homes including facilitation. Orphan's receive food, clothing, education, mentoring and nurturing, life skills, college or trade school assistance.

International

Life House Inc

To reconnect homeless and street youth to their dreams.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Life Family Services and the most unlike its peers is Missionary Daughters of the Eternal Father. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/28

the rest of the field

3,300/38,961

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

24/25

Grantees still filing

24/25

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$2,767,500Human Services$503,000International$241,000Philanthropy$218,500Health$160,000Education$112,000Arts & Culture$77,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Richard M Schulze Family FoundationMN18.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Graco Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The K Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROEHL FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: ELWA MINISTRIES ASSOCIATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 262082932 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on ELWA MINISTRIES ASSOCIATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 27% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Roehl Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roehl Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROEHL FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Roehl Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ROEHL FAMILY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

25 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Roehl Family Foundation?

More from the funding graph