· Private foundation
Robert S Carter Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASATCH HOMELESS HEALTH CARE INC | $12,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $5,000 |
| NATURE CONSERVANCY | $5,000 |
| UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC | $4,000 |
| ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC | $3,500 |
| ARCS FOUNDATION INC UTAH CHAPTER | $3,000 |
| UTAH FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER | $3,000 |
| RURAL UTAH PROJECT EDUCATION FUND | $3,000 |
| THE ROAD HOME | $2,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $2,000 |
| HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY | $2,000 |
| SPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWasatch Homeless Health Care9× · 2017–2025 · $58k · revenue +94%
- UFUTAH FOOD BANK9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +93%
- UOUTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2022–2025 · $16k · revenue +168%
Funded once
- RBRED BUTTE GARDENSone grant, 2021 · $3k
- YWYoung Women's Christian Association of Utahgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +39%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $500
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
The Utah Public Health Association (UPHA) is a statewide membership organization dedicated to improving the health of Utah communities by supporting and representing the public health workforce. UPHA advances public health through…
The promotion of low-income housing within the state of utah.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
To provide quality affordable housing opportunities to individuals and families living in Utah.
Heal utah's mission is to protect utah's environment and its people by promoting clean air, clean energy, and comprehensive solutions to radioactive and toxic waste.
To help people experiencing or at risk of homelessness build new lives through construction, community engagement, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utahns Against Hunger and the most unlike its peers is Children and Youth Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Wasatch Homeless Health Care ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Crossroads Urban Center ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARCS FOUNDATION INC UTAH CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds THE ROAD HOME ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS UTAH INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF UTAH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SALT LAKE AREA ↗
- Who funds UTAHNS AGAINST HUNGER ↗
- Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Utah ↗
- Who funds SPY HOP PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds FULLER CENTER FOR HOUSING OF CACHE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR THE WEST INC ↗
- Who funds STEWARDSHIP UTAH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH ↗
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of Utah ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood House Association ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Marriner S Eccles Foundation · McCarthey Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Willard L Eccles Charitable Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert S Carter Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Robert S Carter Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Robert S Carter Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.